XMPP Council - 2025-02-25


  1. daniel

    It’s time

  2. daniel

    1) Roll call

  3. goffi

    here

  4. larma

    đź‘‹

  5. daniel

    dan.caseley, singpolyma are you around?

  6. daniel

    doesn’t seem like it. let’s move on anyway

  7. daniel

    2) Agenda bashing

  8. daniel

    I sent out a very late agenda but I think you all have seen the XEP beforehand as it was discussed on list and in the xsf room

  9. daniel

    3) Editors update

  10. daniel

    * Proposed XMPP Extension: Server-side spaces https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/spaces.html

  11. daniel

    4) Items for voting

  12. Kev

    FWIW, I've got a bunch of notes on Spaces that's been on my TODO list to write up, that don't exactly match, but I don't think that should prevent accepting this one, unless Council's not going to allow a second submission.

  13. goffi

    I've seen the XEP but I haven't had any time to read it not the discussion, so I can't vote now, I'll be on-list or next week.

  14. daniel

    a) Proposed XMPP Extension: Server-side spaces https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/spaces.html

  15. daniel

    +1

  16. goffi

    I'm concerned about duplication here, when it can be avoided. Kev, MattJ : isn't it possible to merge the work?

  17. daniel

    seems like a solid start for other (like Kev) to give their feedback to

  18. larma

    +1 on spaces

  19. goffi

    Anyway, I'll be on-list after reading the spec and the discussion.

  20. dan.caseley

    Apologies. Here. On list - need to catch up with the mailing list thread.

  21. daniel

    personal opinion: now that Nico moved first MattJ and Kev should probably try to have their use cases covered by that XEP

  22. goffi

    yes, I think that it should have been done on standard@ in the first place.

  23. daniel

    if that doesn’t work out at all (if there is a very good reason) I’m sure council would consider a second xep

  24. goffi

    So it make sense to use nicoco one as basis.

  25. Kev

    Yes.

  26. goffi

    So it makes sense to use nicoco one as basis.

  27. daniel

    5) Pending votes

  28. daniel

    note that I removed retractions from the pending votes and also didn’t put FAST on the agenda. I think for now it's best to give the authors some more time

  29. daniel

    6) Date of Next

  30. daniel

    +1w wfm

  31. goffi

    +1w wfm

  32. larma

    Probably not available +1w

  33. daniel

    ok noted larma

  34. daniel

    7) AOB

  35. dan.caseley

    +1w wfm

  36. daniel

    assuming no AOB

  37. daniel

    8) Close

  38. daniel

    thank you all. see you next week

  39. singpolyma

    Apologies. +1 on spaces

  40. goffi

    Thanks daniel, thanks all

  41. daniel

    singpolyma, thanks. recorded