XMPP Council - 2025-12-02

  1. goffi

    Hi daniel, I don't see the Forum XEP in your update, should not it be published? Thanks.

  2. Daniel

    Yes I had limited time. I put priority on the things we need in our meeting

  3. goffi

    Daniel, OK no problem, I just wanted to be sure that it has not been forgotten. There i no rush on it anyway.

  4. dan.caseley

    Apologies - I won't make today's session. I've got a last minute work clash :(

  5. daniel

    it’s time

  6. daniel

    1) Roll call

  7. goffi

    Hi brand new council, here!

    ✨️ 1
  8. larma

    👋

  9. singpolyma

    hello

  10. daniel

    2) Agenda bashing

  11. daniel

    nothing to bash i assume?

  12. daniel

    3) Editors update

  13. daniel

    - UPDATED: XEP-0353 (Jingle Message Initiation) - Proposed XMPP Extension: Initial Authentication Pipelining (https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/iap.html)

  14. daniel

    editors note at least one xep still awaits publication

  15. daniel

    4) Items for voting

  16. daniel

    a) XEP-0045: clarify muc#roomconfig_allowinvites https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1484

  17. daniel

    on list

  18. goffi

    +1

  19. singpolyma

    +1

  20. larma

    +1

  21. daniel

    b) Proposed XMPP Extension: Initial Authentication Pipelining https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/iap.html

  22. daniel

    +1

  23. goffi

    on list

  24. larma

    +1

  25. singpolyma

    +1

  26. daniel

    c) Issue Last Call on XEP-0377: Spam Reporting https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0377.html

  27. daniel

    +1

  28. singpolyma

    the name seems a bit specific. it's caps for stream features, could be used for things other than auth

  29. goffi

    +1

  30. larma

    Re b: I think the element name is a little confusing (as it's not the name of the feature inside the features blcok), but that aside, it makes sense

  31. singpolyma

    +1

  32. larma

    Did the author agree on LC?

  33. daniel

    one of the authors (guus) requested it

    ✔️ 1
  34. larma

    OK, perfect

  35. daniel

    in here. two weeks ago?

  36. larma

    +1

  37. daniel

    5) Pending votes

  38. daniel

    none

  39. daniel

    6) Date of next

  40. daniel

    +1w wfm

  41. goffi

    +1w wfm

  42. daniel

    assuming the rest of you are fine with +1w

  43. daniel

    7) AOB

  44. daniel

    assuming no AOB

  45. daniel

    8) close

  46. daniel

    thank you all. see you next week

  47. goffi

    Thanks daniel, thanks all.

  48. badrihippo

    I love how efficient XSF text meetings are

  49. dwd

    So efficient I missed it! But I saw no questions on IAP anyway.

  50. badrihippo

    What do IAP, AOB, and LC mean?

  51. badrihippo

    Oh I'm guessing LC = Last Call

  52. badrihippo

    And AOB = Any Other Business?

  53. MattJ

    Yep

  54. MattJ

    IAP = https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/iap.html

  55. badrihippo

    Ah

  56. dwd

    badrihippo, Yeah, IAP is just a little spec I wrote.

  57. badrihippo

    Yeah I realised 😅️ I'm glad I managed to expand out the more regular acronyms though!

  58. dan.caseley

    TLAs FTW!

  59. goffi

    It would be great to have a way to indicate common accronyms used in a room, I'm pretty sure it would improve accessibility.

  60. goffi

    Or more generally a room glossary. It could go in room metadata.

  61. Zash

    Like the description? or topic?

  62. dan.caseley

    I can see a room-contextual glossary being useful in a bunch of different scenarios.