-
dan.caseley
Ahead of today's meeting, I'll quickly record votes I missed last week
-
dan.caseley
+1 on clarify muc#roomconfig_allowinvites
-
dan.caseley
+1 on IAP (I've reported a couple of rendering oddities to dwd, but they're non-blocking)
-
dan.caseley
+1 on Spam Reporting
-
daniel
for the record Iām also +1 on allow invites
-
daniel
oh. i forgot to write goffi down as a pending vote
-
goffi
daniel, no worries, I'm aware of my pending vote.
-
goffi
Btw, anybody knows why the XEP names are not properly expanded in `inbox`? I have this in the introduction of iap: `When clients (or initiating servers) connect, thanks to there is now a single waited-for round-trip after the connection itself is established, before the exchange of stanzas can occur.` note the `thanks to there`, while the source XML uses apparently correctly ` thanks to &xep0388;`.
-
goffi
Also the xml is not properly shown if we changes `html` for `xml` in the URL (while it works for published XEPs).
-
Daniel
Maybe a question for the infra team
-
dan.caseley
Interesting, that was one of the rendering issues I reported to dwd!
-
dan.caseley
Had assumed an author error
-
Daniel
It's time
-
Daniel
1) roll call
-
dan.caseley
Hello!
-
goffi
Here
-
daniel
singpolyma, larma?
-
daniel
2) Agenda bashing
-
daniel
probably a quick one today. I assume nothing to bash?
-
daniel
3) Editors update
-
daniel
- STABLE: XEP-0440 (SASL Channel-Binding Type Capability) - NEW: XEP-0508 (Forums)
-
daniel
4) Items for voting
-
daniel
nothing new
-
daniel
5) Pending votes
-
daniel
since dan.caseley and myself voted in between the agenda and now it's only goffi missing on iap
-
goffi
I'm +1 on iap
-
larma
> singpolyma, larma? here, but nothing to vote or aob from me anyways ↺
-
daniel
6) Date of next
-
goffi
+1w wfm
-
dan.caseley
+1w wfm
-
daniel
we can probably do one more meeting next week and go on a ~2w holiday break after that?
-
daniel
+1w wmf
-
goffi
daniel, year that seems reasonable. I'm not sure I'll make it on 30 though.
-
singpolyma
+1w wfm sorry for my tardiness today
-
daniel
oh i meant skipping two meetings. skip the 23rd and the 30th. but yes we can discuss the next week
-
daniel
7) AOB
-
Guus
Given that we're gearing up towards a summit: maybe Council can have a think next week to see if there's any input from council to the summit that'd be desirable?
-
Guus
I have no concrete ideas or anything, but there's an opportunity with a bunch of relevant people sitting in the same room, soonish - if we can benefit from that in any way - lets.
-
dan.caseley
"Do _you_ have a XEP that you'd like to promote to stable? Council can help!"
š 1 -
daniel
iirc i did a whole speech about that last year. but Iām happy to repeat that :-)
-
singpolyma
Is it worth to suggest discussing a refresh to compliance suites?
-
Zash
Only _you_ can prevent ~forest fires~ Deferred XEPs
-
daniel
i have ideas for an overhaul of the compliance suite. i hope to have something ready before summit
š 1 -
daniel
as a basis of discussion
-
goffi
I think that compliance should be updated yearly, if only to say "compliant XXXX" were XXXX is not 3 years olds (even if it's the latest).
-
daniel
assuming no other AOB?
-
daniel
8) Close
-
daniel
Thank you all. see you next week
-
singpolyma
That means a lot of deferred compliance xep specs but we've discussed maybe xep isn't the way
-
goffi
Thanks daniel, thanks all.
-
goffi
Yeah maybe, let's see what @daniel has to propose, and discuss that at summit.