XMPP Council - 2026-06-02

  1. daniel

    It’s time

  2. daniel

    1) Roll call

  3. dan.caseley

    Hello!

  4. goffi

    .o/

  5. Daniel

    singpolyma, larma you around?

  6. larma

    👋

  7. daniel

    2) Agenda bashing

  8. daniel

    nothing to bash, I assume

  9. daniel

    3) Editors update

  10. daniel

    • UPDATED: XEP-0045 (Multi-User Chat) https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html • NEW: XEP-0514 (Emoji Markup) https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0514.html • Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle Synchronized Real-Time Text https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-rtt-sync.html • Proposed XMPP Extension: XMPP Decentralized ID (XID) https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/xid.html • Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle User Location https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-geoloc.html

  11. daniel

    4) Items for voting

  12. daniel

    a) Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle Synchronized Real-Time Text https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-rtt-sync.html

  13. daniel

    on list

  14. goffi

    on list

  15. dan.caseley

    On list

  16. larma

    On list

  17. daniel

    b) Proposed XMPP Extension: XMPP Decentralized ID (XID) https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/xid.html

  18. daniel

    on list

  19. goffi

    +1

  20. goffi

    (I'm the author)

  21. larma

    On list

  22. dan.caseley

    On list. I've read it, and close to +1, but want to re-read the key exchange.

  23. goffi

    I have some change to do if validated anyway

  24. larma

    (Short comment: I'm a bit surprised we can't just use the jid we had before when binding jid to xid is such a major part)

  25. goffi

    following dwd feedbacks

  26. daniel

    c) Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle User Location https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-geoloc.html

  27. daniel

    on list

  28. goffi

    I'm not sure why we want to do that with Jingle

  29. Cynthia

    I have a question about XID

  30. dan.caseley

    On list

  31. goffi

    I'll be on-linst, but right now it seems like a bazooka for something we can just throw to messages or PEP

  32. daniel

    Cynthia, you can use the standards mailing list (or the xsf muc)

  33. larma

    I'm leaning towards -1, but I will give them time to convince me of not doing so on list

  34. Cynthia

    Alright

  35. dan.caseley

    I've not read this one at all yet, sorry

  36. daniel

    5) Pending votes

  37. daniel

    none

  38. daniel

    6) Date of next

  39. daniel

    +1w wfm

  40. goffi

    +1w wfm

  41. dan.caseley

    +1w wfm

  42. larma

    I will be traveling +1w, but might still be able to join

  43. daniel

    7) AOB

    🫙 1
  44. goffi

    (it's the closest emoji I've found to "nothing")

  45. goffi

    ∅ would work, but I can't use it with Gajim apparently.

  46. daniel

    looks like none. in that case:

  47. daniel

    8) Close

  48. daniel

    thank you all. see you next week

  49. goffi

    Thanks Daniel, Thanks all

  50. goffi

    > (Short comment: I'm a bit surprised we can't just use the jid we had before when binding jid to xid is such a major part) Not sure to understand, you say that the server mapping is unnecessary? ↺

  51. larma

    goffi: the question was basically what we need it for, the examples you provided it feels to me that jid could also work there? Because jid and xid are bound anyways

  52. goffi

    There are a couple of use cases explained in the XEP, first one is serverless. But also server change, tying identities together, this kind of things.

  53. goffi

    If I'm on server A which becomes down without warning, I can't move and keep my identity with DNS-based JID, with XID I can.

  54. goffi

    Actually XEP-0080 already specifies a PEP node to track location.

  55. singpolyma

    hi sorry I was apparently desynced from this muc