XMPP Council - 2026-06-15

  1. Daniel

    If the future of council+editor is to review a bunch of AI slop I'm not sure how much longer I want to do this job

  2. Cynthia

    Why not ban low-effort XEPs. At least the ones that took less effort than it takes to review them and polish them up ✎

  3. Cynthia

    Why not ban low-effort XEPs. At least the ones that took less effort to make than it takes to review them and polish them up ✏

  4. singpolyma

    to ban them someone must still look at them

  5. MattJ

    It's 2026 - not necessarily!

  6. goffi

    > If the future of council+editor is to review a bunch of AI slop I'm not sure how much longer I want to do this job We got slop submitted ?

  7. Cynthia

    > to ban them someone must still look at them Like ban the author behind it and the XEP, not just the XEP itself ↺

  8. Cynthia

    (Then again, someone could bypass this with alt accounts, soooooo) ✎

  9. Cynthia

    (Then again, someone could bypass this with alt accounts, soooooo... yeah that's a tough question) ✏

  10. moparisthebest

    thank goodness we have github to prevent fake accounts

  11. Cynthia

    Is that sarcasm? :P

  12. moparisthebest

    I mean if you asked github they would confidently claim they do that

  13. Kev

    > > If the future of council+editor is to review a bunch of AI slop I'm not sure how much longer I want to do this job > We got slop submitted ? There’s one PR I’ve seen go by recently that has messages on it that look like they’re straight out of an agent, at least, although that’s not conclusive proof, and doesn’t necessarily mean the content is slop on its own.