End to End Encryption SIG - 2021-12-30


  1. hello has joined
  2. Titi has left
  3. Seve has left
  4. hello has left
  5. meeson_ has left
  6. meeson_ has joined
  7. hello has joined
  8. meeson_ has left
  9. hello has left
  10. Millesimus has left
  11. meeson_ has joined
  12. sequals has left
  13. sequals has joined
  14. Millesimus has joined
  15. meeson_ has left
  16. meeson_ has joined
  17. Millesimus has left
  18. meeson_ has left
  19. Millesimus has joined
  20. meeson_ has joined
  21. Millesimus has left
  22. msavoritias has joined
  23. sequals has left
  24. sequals has joined
  25. Millesimus has joined
  26. hello has joined
  27. thilo.molitor has left
  28. hello has left
  29. Thilo Molitor has left
  30. Thilo Molitor has joined
  31. Seve has joined
  32. tritium has joined
  33. hello has joined
  34. Jeroen has joined
  35. Jeroen has left
  36. Jeroen has joined
  37. Jeroen has left
  38. hello has left
  39. meeson_ has left
  40. meeson_ has joined
  41. hello has joined
  42. hello has left
  43. hello has joined
  44. Jeroen has joined
  45. Jeroen has left
  46. Titi has joined
  47. hello has left
  48. thilo.molitor has joined
  49. hello has joined
  50. Jeroen has joined
  51. tritium has left
  52. tritium has joined
  53. hello has left
  54. Titi has left
  55. Neustradamis has joined
  56. Neustradamis has left
  57. atomicwatch has left
  58. hello has joined
  59. thilo.molitor has left
  60. thilo.molitor has joined
  61. atomicwatch has joined
  62. sequals has left
  63. me9 has joined
  64. sequals has joined
  65. Titi has joined
  66. hello has left
  67. hello has joined
  68. Millesimus has left
  69. Millesimus has joined
  70. tritium has left
  71. tritium has joined
  72. Millesimus has left
  73. Titi has left
  74. hello has left
  75. Millesimus has joined
  76. hello has joined
  77. tritium has left
  78. Millesimus has left
  79. Jeroen has left
  80. sequals has left
  81. sequals has joined
  82. Millesimus has joined
  83. *IM* has left
  84. Jeroen has joined
  85. meeson_ has left
  86. meeson_ has joined
  87. pep. Yeah this article is debatable, at least. “So E2EE only hinders State surveillance marginally and exposes users to an increased risk of being hacked by the State.” < The last part of this sentence is not backed up by any kind of data, it appears out of nowhere. (that it increases risks) “E2EE is not effective against surveillance if it is not accompanied with metadata protection.” < This is a useless statement? Sure e2ee doesn't protect against leaking metadata, so what? “An even bigger issue here are message archives and audit trails.” < “e2ee is bad because it can't be decrypted” do I understand correctly? And then tackling on the "false sense of security". Not questioning at all the fact that users (people in general) aren't taught what security means is maybe the issue rather (or tech in general, not just security)
  88. hello has left
  89. *IM* has joined
  90. hello has joined
  91. meeson_ has left
  92. meeson_ has joined
  93. tritium has joined
  94. pep. has left
  95. pep. has joined
  96. *IM* has left
  97. *IM* has joined
  98. Alastair Hogge The only point I was able to extract from the article was, that marketing or propagandising of E2EE apps as exploits the ignorance of the app user, example the blind trusting of other agents'
  99. Alastair Hogge s/as//
  100. *IM* has left
  101. *IM* has joined
  102. Jeroen has left
  103. atomicwatch has left
  104. atomicwatch has joined
  105. Jeroen has joined
  106. Titi has joined
  107. hello has left
  108. hello has joined
  109. meeson_ has left
  110. meeson_ has joined
  111. Neustradamis has joined
  112. melvo has left
  113. Jeroen has left
  114. Jeroen has joined
  115. Jeroen has left
  116. Jeroen has joined
  117. Jeroen has left
  118. tritium has left
  119. Jeroen has joined
  120. Jeroen has left
  121. Jeroen has joined
  122. Jeroen has left
  123. me9 has left
  124. Jeroen has joined
  125. Jeroen has left
  126. thilo.molitor has left
  127. hello has left
  128. Jeroen has joined
  129. Jeroen has left
  130. Jeroen has joined
  131. Jeroen has left
  132. Jeroen has joined
  133. Jeroen has left
  134. Jeroen has joined
  135. hello has joined
  136. Jeroen has left
  137. thilo.molitor has joined
  138. *IM* has left
  139. Jeroen has joined
  140. Jeroen has left
  141. hello has left
  142. melvo has joined
  143. Jeroen has joined
  144. Jeroen has left
  145. Jeroen has joined
  146. Jeroen has left
  147. hello has joined
  148. me9 has joined
  149. tritium has joined
  150. hello has left
  151. Millesimus has left
  152. hello has joined
  153. *IM* has joined
  154. Millesimus has joined
  155. Titi has left
  156. Titi has joined
  157. hello has left
  158. moparisthebest it also wrongly assumes that state surveillance is the only thing it's protecting against
  159. Millesimus has left
  160. hello has joined
  161. Millesimus has joined
  162. Millesimus has left
  163. hello has left
  164. Jeroen has joined
  165. Jeroen has left
  166. Jeroen has joined
  167. hello has joined
  168. Millesimus has joined
  169. qy Do i have to manually send out pubsub#event headlines?
  170. Jeroen has left
  171. qy Or is that done by the server
  172. hello has left
  173. hello has joined
  174. Millesimus has left
  175. MattJ qy, by the server, that's kinda the point of pubsub :)
  176. qy Right, yeah, just checking :)
  177. qy I distractedly just tried sending external iqs
  178. qy Wasnt sure headlines followed the same logic
  179. atomicwatch has left
  180. hello has left
  181. msavoritias has left
  182. Titi has left
  183. qy Okay i'm reading the 0384, am i right in understanding that sending an <encrypted> block with no payload is how to initiate a session? Or otherwise, how? Cause i'm announcing bundle and devicelist, but my other account is still not initiating one with me best i can tell
  184. me9 has left
  185. tritium has left
  186. larma The session is typically initiated with the first message
  187. qy Right, but my other account doesnt look to be trying, is that perhaps because it tried earlier, and its still waiting for a response?
  188. qy Im not sure what step is missing
  189. sequals has left
  190. meeson_ has left
  191. qy I can initiate one myself on my side, but i fancied at least a little verification im not going the wrong path
  192. qy Jeez i need someone who's implemented this before who's brain i can pick on the regular, cause i can't grok the spec well enough
  193. Jeroen has joined
  194. Jeroen has left
  195. *IM* moparisthebest: > it also wrongly assumes that state surveillance is the only thing it's protecting against What else? Could you give examples?
  196. Jeroen has joined
  197. Jeroen has left
  198. moparisthebest *IM*: evil WiFi, evil server operators, server hacking/compromise, abusive spouse, probably more?
  199. *IM* Thanks a lot!
  200. hello has joined
  201. meeson_ has joined