XSF Editor Team - 2014-03-10


  1. Neustradamus has left

  2. jabberjocke has left

  3. jabberjocke has joined

  4. jabberjocke has left

  5. jabberjocke has joined

  6. jabberjocke has left

  7. jabberjocke has joined

  8. jabberjocke has left

  9. Lloyd has joined

  10. jabberjocke has joined

  11. jabberjocke

    hi kev have you looked at my mail to the editors?

  12. jabberjocke

    about the IoT update

  13. Kev

    Hiya. I'm not one of the editors, I'm just here to see what's going on.

  14. jabberjocke

    got an answer from the list moderator

  15. Kev

    http://xmpp.org/participate/become-a-member/editor-team/

  16. jabberjocke

    that it had to be moderated before going to the list

  17. Kev

    Ah.

  18. Kev

    Not me, I'm afraid.

  19. jabberjocke

    ok

  20. Kev

    Ping one of the people on that page (Lloyd is here, and he's on the team)

  21. jabberjocke

    will do

  22. Lloyd

    I'm afraid I don't have access to anything yet.

  23. jabberjocke has left

  24. Steffen Larsen has joined

  25. m&m has joined

  26. Steffen Larsen has left

  27. jabberjocke has joined

  28. jabberjocke has left

  29. Lloyd has left

  30. stpeter has joined

  31. stpeter

    yay m&m

  32. m&m

    I'm trying

  33. m&m

    that was involved though (-:

  34. stpeter

    :)

  35. stpeter

    need to get the rest of the team up to speed

  36. m&m

    yes

  37. stpeter heats up some lunch, bbiaf

  38. m&m

    and the tools updated

  39. m&m

    for instance, is there a reason that the diffs URL needs to be specified on the command line?

  40. stpeter

    m&m no great reason AFAIK

  41. m&m

    I wonder if it could be calculated from the "revision > version" values

  42. m&m

    assuming that revision[0] is always the latest

  43. m&m goes off foraging for lunch

  44. Steffen Larsen has joined

  45. Steffen Larsen

    Hi guys!

  46. Steffen Larsen

    back from vacation. We have a meeting tomorrow, right?

  47. stpeter

    I think so

  48. m&m

    yes

  49. stpeter

    given timezone changes, let's make sure we agree on the time in UTC

  50. stpeter

    in the US we moved the clocks forward an hour over the weekend

  51. m&m

    /sigh

  52. m&m

    right

  53. m&m

    although I thought I specified the time in UTC a fortnight ago (-:

  54. stpeter

    probably

  55. stpeter

    that seems like an age and a day

  56. m&m grumbles about calendars start on Monday and not Sunday

  57. stpeter

    hwh

  58. stpeter

    heh even

  59. stpeter

    need to log off for a bit, bbl

  60. stpeter has left

  61. m&m

    2014-03-11 @ 16:00 UTC

  62. Steffen Larsen

    ok super

  63. m&m

    I do need to come up with an agenda, don't I?

  64. Steffen Larsen

    well, maybe also a status about privileges for git etc

  65. m&m

    so that would be part of the agenda (-:

  66. Steffen Larsen

    :-)

  67. Steffen Larsen

    and maybe what XEPs are in queue etc.

  68. m&m

    I think tomorrow's meeting will be a postmortem discussion

  69. Steffen Larsen

    is that visiable somewhere? or do we only get it by email

  70. m&m

    from the first attempt to have !stpeter publish XEPs

  71. Steffen Larsen

    yes

  72. m&m

    I keep meaning to write it down, but fail

  73. m&m

    I blame the IETF

  74. Steffen Larsen

    :-)

  75. m&m

    the queue right now is just email

  76. jabberjocke has joined

  77. Steffen Larsen has left

  78. stpeter has joined

  79. m&m

    stpeter: what is expected of the XEP editor with regards to BOSH right now?

  80. Neustradamus has left