SamWhitedWe already have a Trello for boards, FYI, please do not use GitHub boards. I don't really care between the two, but let's not duplicate info and everyone was already using Trello.
SamWhitedI have closed the GitHub boards.
SamWhitedFeel free to rearrange or rename columns in the trello board if you need to. If you can't, let me know and I'll fix permissions (but I think everyone can)
jonaswI don’t like trello.
SamWhitedMe neither.
jonaswany good reason not to move to github "projects"?
jonaswthey’re nicely integrated.
SamWhitedEveryone was already using Trello
jonaswthere’s no tight coupling between the boards, is there?
SamWhitedIf the council has a thing on Trello, they can move it directly to the editor board. Let's not try to change our entire process just because I don't love something.
SamWhitedIt works and is "good enough".
jonaswright, maybe I don’t know trello well enough
SamWhiteds/I/we/
jonaswwhat I liked about the github things is that you can see right on the PR what the status in council etc. is
Guus(github has a Trello-like feature?)
jonaswGuus, yeah, they added that a few months ago I think
SamWhitedGuus: I think they call it "Projects", it's fairly recent.
jonaswI used it to track PRs through council
SamWhitedI assume Trello has a GitHub integration we could enable, but I haven't tried it; it was never really a problem.
SamWhitedI just don't want info ending up in two places with council looking at our Trello and half the stuff being on GitHub.
jonaswI put the stuff on council trello whenever needed.
jonaswSamWhited, what do you suggest as a means of communication so that work I do on the xeps repo (e.g. with respect to tooling) is seen by all active editors?
jonaswI tried PRs on the xeps repository which apparently didn’t really help.
jonaswI can ping the editors list, do you think that’d be more useful?
jonaswalso it’d have been nice to get some notice before you simply close the boards -- they are referenced in the current readme
jonaswand I currently don’t have the time to re-work the readme
jonaswalso it is a bit demotivating to get my work (thought put into a process I can work efficiently with, given that there was only sparse documentation, the timezone issue noone of us can do something about and the huge backlog) reverted without a word of discussion.
Guushas left
SamWhitedjonasw: the email list would be good for communication
jonaswright, let’s try that
SamWhitedSorry if it's demotivating, but please don't just duplicate work that's already been done.
Guushas left
jonaswSamWhited, I understand.
Guushas left
SamWhitedReworked the readme: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/519
SamWhitedIf we want to change in the future that's fine, but for now let's not make the editor process require any more steps than it already does.
SamWhitedAnd let's discuss before changing the process.
Guushas left
jonaswSamWhited, okay, fair
jonaswI’m composing an email with an overview of what I did in the last month besides working on XEP updates.
Guushas left
jonaswthanks for the fix to the readme
SamWhitedSure thing; thanks for all the work you've been doing?