-
jonasw
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/691/files Am I really supposed to create a revision block for that, reviving a XEP which hasn’t been touched for eight (!) years from Deferred?
-
jonasw
okay, in this specific example it makes sense
-
jonasw
there *has* been more interest in Moved recently
-
jonasw
but I still don’t think that reviving it from Deferred is warranted just yet
-
Kev
I think the rule is just "anyone updates it, it moves back from deferred"
-
jonasw
is an extremely simple typo fix an update?
-
Kev
Is there a reason not to?
-
jonasw
it appears more active than it is
-
Kev
Experimental only says "There has been an update", not how interesting the update is.
-
Kev
Otherwise, we need a process for deciding which updates justify moving back from Deferred.
-
Kev
And that presumably has to be Council rather than Editor.
-
jonasw
editorial vs. non-editorial?
-
Kev
And ... that seems heavyweight.
-
jonasw
another question: what do people think of putting attic links into the notification emails?
-
Kev
In favour.
-
jonasw
I see three benefits: 1. the links are stable in the sense that they point to the version the email is discussing and always will 2. I can send notification emails right away and don’t have to wait for the docker build process, because I build the attic myself 3. I am less likely to forget pushing the attic after an update because the links are needed for the emails
-
SamWhited
Seems like an editorial decision to me; this was the sort of thing I would never bother bumping for.
-
pep.
numbers are cheap
-
pep.
I'm not really arguing for this though. Not sure what to think. I guess if it's automated it doesn't really matter
-
jonasw
you wish it was automated
-
pep.
;)
-
SamWhited
s/bumping/bumping or changing the state/