XSF Editor Team - 2019-10-23


  1. jonas’

    am I correct that dwd still hasn’t voted?

  2. Kev

    I belive so.

  3. Kev

    +sp

  4. Kev

    Now he has.

  5. jonas’

    pep., will issue the LC now

  6. pep.

    Ol

  7. pep.

    Ok

  8. jonas’

    (done already)

  9. jonas’

    btw, pro tip: build the docker thing locally, it’s about two orders of magnitude faster

  10. pep.

    And then pish that to docker hub?

  11. jonas’

    yes

  12. jonas’

    docker build . --build-arg NCORES=9 -t xmppxsf/xeps:latest

  13. pep.

    And then push that to docker hub?

  14. pep.

    An idea what takes the most time? Texlive/pdfs?

  15. jonas’

    pdfs, yes

  16. jonas’

    also, it runs with only a single thread in the CI

  17. jonas’

    so the factor of 9 brings approximately one order of magnitude, pair that with an uncontested SSD storage, RAM and Cache and that probably explains the massive speedup compared to docker hub

  18. pep.

    :/

  19. pep.

    Maybe we could split the pdfs generation somehow? I'd say if fine if they come in later and HTML/XML get served first

  20. jonas’

    that’d only work if we had incremental builds

  21. jonas’

    or two separate docker containers and more complex nginx routing rules

  22. pep.

    For some definition of complex, it doesn't seem very much complex to me with nginx

  23. jonas’

    I just said "more complex [compared to what we have currently]"

  24. pep.

    Sure

  25. Guus

    On the CS last call, I noticed that XEP-0385 is mentioned both in section 1.1 "Changes since 2019", but also in section 3 "Future Development". That's confusing.

  26. Guus

    (and I wonder if it's an omission, which is why I'm raising this with the editors)

  27. jonas’

    Guus, the sections are both managed by the author

  28. jonas’

    please raise it on-list