XSF Editor Team - 2020-06-16


  1. bear has left
  2. bear has joined
  3. jonas’ pep., my 2 cents are exactly the same
  4. jonas’ now you know what you have to discuss on thursday
  5. Tobi has left
  6. Tobi has joined
  7. lnj has left
  8. lnj has joined
  9. debacle has joined
  10. Guus has left
  11. Guus has joined
  12. bear has left
  13. bear has joined
  14. pep. yeah I was initially confused because I hadn't seen that LICENSE file
  15. larma has joined
  16. larma has left
  17. larma has joined
  18. winfried has left
  19. winfried has joined
  20. winfried has left
  21. winfried has joined
  22. winfried has left
  23. winfried has joined
  24. debacle has left
  25. winfried has left
  26. winfried has joined
  27. winfried has left
  28. winfried has joined
  29. jonas’ so one thing we could do would be to set up a two-way sync for the main branches between github and gitlab. then we’d use the CI on gitlab for all the automated tasks as well as MRs on gitlab, and travis CI for checking PRs on github.
  30. jonas’ then hitting the green button on either side of the trench would eventually reach the gitlab main branch and trigger the auto-CI
  31. jonas’ MRs on gitlab would get advanced stuff, editors wouldn’t have to worry too much about syncing things over.
  32. jonas’ this is all provided we can sort out the legal stuff around DCO/CLA/…. if we can’t, we could still run this setup without enabling MRs on the gitlab side.
  33. jonas’ pep., ^ what do you think?
  34. pep. two-way sync, is that easy to do? gitlab feature? We'd still have to worry about PRs right? moving them over. As they're not branches on the xsf repo (well, however that's done internally on github, that's not public)
  35. pep. And even if they were they wouldn't be declared "MR" on gitlab as that's an explicit action from the user
  36. pep. Otherwise that works for me
  37. winfried has left
  38. winfried has joined
  39. jonas’ no need to worry about moving PRs, because we can just hit merge on github and let the two-way sync do its thing
  40. pep. Ah I see
  41. jonas’ I’d only two-way sync the main branches
  42. pep. Editors would have to worry about two places still, that's a bit annoying and error-prone, but yeah otherwise that's better than the original "2." you proposed
  43. jonas’ the advantage for editors is though that we can simply hit Merge instead of doing things locally on the CLI
  44. jonas’ I think that is a viable trade-off
  45. jonas’ (especially since you can get email notifications from both places, so you don’t have to poll much)
  46. jonas’ re how to implement two-way sync: a GitHub Action with a write-access Deploy Key to the GitLab side which does a git push, and effectively the same on the other side
  47. pep. ok
  48. jonas’ if two merges happen concurrently on both ends, that job will fail and the situation needs to be resolved manually by an editor
  49. larma has left
  50. winfried has left
  51. winfried has joined
  52. larma has joined
  53. winfried has left
  54. winfried has joined
  55. winfried has left
  56. winfried has joined
  57. winfried has left
  58. winfried has joined
  59. winfried has left
  60. winfried has joined
  61. winfried has left
  62. winfried has joined
  63. larma has left
  64. larma has joined
  65. winfried has left
  66. winfried has joined
  67. stpeter has joined
  68. winfried has left
  69. winfried has joined
  70. larma has left
  71. larma has joined
  72. larma has left
  73. larma has joined
  74. winfried has left
  75. winfried has joined
  76. jonas’ pep., also, if you think that the option I just proposed is bad, please say so directly
  77. jonas’ bad = too much work for editors
  78. jonas’ I currently don’t see it that way, but your voice counts
  79. pep. I did ask myself if that was worth it, doing all this, tbh. But I think it is. Reduced build time, automatic archiving, sending of emails, possibly tagging
  80. pep. And more goodies the day we actually switch, if we ever switch.
  81. jonas’ thanks
  82. pep. It will be confusing for anybody new to the team or any external people and that should probably be explained. "What's the preferred venue" "What's the preferred way for you to submit stuff"
  83. pep. But you're the most affected, I don't do as much as you so I'm happy to let you drive :)
  84. larma has left
  85. larma has joined
  86. jonas’ sure, we need to update documentation
  87. jonas’ one point on my todo is also mkdir src && mv *.xml src
  88. jonas’ or similar
  89. jonas’ so that you don’t have to scroll down two miles to get to the repository readme
  90. jonas’ mail sent for standards@ to discuss
  91. jonas’ mail sent to standards@ to discuss
  92. jonas’ now to prepare some strawberries <3
  93. larma has left
  94. pep. :)
  95. jonas’ 16:51:31 pep.> But you're the most affected, I don't do as much as you so I'm happy to let you drive :) I wish for that to not stay that way. So it is very very important that I hear editor voices which say "this is going to make it worse (for me)"
  96. pep. yeah I hope for you it's not going to stay that way :x
  97. jonas’ I hope for the XSF
  98. pep. Right I was gonna correct myself
  99. jonas’ because I’m not going to be around forever, according to the second law of thermodynamics
  100. pep. It's not your fault if tomorrow you disappear
  101. pep. Or tomorrow you just don't want to contribute anymore you should be free to do so :)
  102. jonas’ yupp
  103. pep. It annoys me thinking that some of our roles here may be filled by guilt ("If I disappear tomorrow this will just get dropped"). It's probably not obvious to everyone though, and working towards making people realize is an uphill battle..
  104. jonas’ oh, I’m very aware of that
  105. jonas’ it is not the case for me, luckily
  106. pep. I don't know if it affects me that much, certainly a bit. Board meeting minutes for example :x
  107. jonas’ I actually enjoy the roles I have. setting a schedule for chair/editor work has also definitely helped in not letting it slide for stupid reasons
  108. pep. Which is why I started grumping
  109. jonas’ I would do them more often if it wasn’t such a bad time slot for me
  110. jonas’ (I like taking minutes, and people seem to like reading mine)
  111. pep. Yeah it's just an example
  112. jonas’ sure
  113. jonas’ but I agree that an automated tool would be better for this
  114. pep. People also don't understand that not trying to figure this kind of issues in the community is in fact reinforcing the status quo and that makes me sad :(
  115. jonas’ is it really that, or is it that people feel powerless toward that?
  116. pep. powerless? As in they can't help with minutes for example?
  117. pep. (I also agree an automated solution would be best, even though we still need somebody to run the thing and maybe tidy it up before sending it)
  118. larma has joined
  119. jonas’ pep., but if people who don’t want to help out with minutse, they also do that by guilt
  120. pep. What I want out of that is mostly make it explicit. If one person is "fine" with continuing by themselves then good, otherwise sharing the guilt isn't too bad
  121. jonas’ right
  122. pep. Working towards a solution to prevent this to happen in the future
  123. jonas’ obvious solution: make minute taking a membership duty and if you can’t do it without giving a reason, you can’t stand for reelection next time :>
  124. jonas’ I wonder what that’ll do to our membership numbers
  125. jonas’ I wonder what that’d do to our membership numbers
  126. pep. I actually thought of such a solution
  127. pep. But then there might be even less reasons to apply as a member :P
  128. pep. semi-joking
  129. pep. I do want to encourage members to participate in the XSF life. I'm fairly annoyed that most members idle
  130. pep. If a new member can spend 30mn-1h a week that would certainly alleviate work already from more involved members
  131. jonas’ indeed
  132. pep. I am under the impression though that it's not interesting for some part of the membership to get in more members
  133. jonas’ I’m not quite sure what we get out of having more members to be honest
  134. pep. Fresh air, for one :)
  135. jonas’ right
  136. jonas’ I mean diversity would be nice, but that’s not what I’m seeing with new members when we get any
  137. pep. Probably because we're not looking for this
  138. jonas’ I’m not sure why we nede to be looking for it
  139. pep. Maybe because I'm not happy with the status quo :)
  140. Tobi has left
  141. Tobi has joined
  142. Kev FWIW, I managed to completely burn out on XSF stuff over the first 15 years or so. Although that's aided by me being burnt out with work too.
  143. jonas’ Kev, sorry to hear
  144. Kev I mean, I did Council for 10 years solid I think, chairing most of it, Iteam lead for probably nearly as long? Maybe less.
  145. Kev I know all this stuff is effort, and I'm grateful that you keep the Editors stuff moving. I'm not trying to be difficult when I raise support for staying on github, and I'm sorry if it comes across as such.
  146. jonas’ Kev, no, as I tried to repeatedly bring across: It is truly appreciated.
  147. jonas’ when you’re in the flow of doing things, it’s easy to overlook problems that’ll cause down the road
  148. jonas’ people calling me out on that are always good and I’m in the process of learning to be grateful for that
  149. jonas’ Kev, also, while we’re at it: thanks for your input in all the other places over the time and take care of yourself.
  150. Kev Oh, sorry, I wasn't saying I need sympathy. When I said "burnt out" I was probably being misleading. I think I suffered from (real) burnout a few years back, but these days I'm bimbling along more or less.
  151. jonas’ I didn’t want to imply you were saying that. I am, however, also in the process to learn to thank people for things many others take for granted.
  152. jonas’ because why not, if its genuine, and maybe it makes people happy
  153. Kev Well, thanks for the thanks? :)
  154. jonas’ you’re welcome
  155. stpeter has left
  156. bear has left
  157. stpeter has joined
  158. lnj has left
  159. bear has joined
  160. Tobi has left
  161. lnj has joined
  162. lnj has left