-
mdosch
PR 998: Just add 'needs author' and wait for vanitasvitaes input? Maybe ask melvo to link to the discussion (not sure whether this was on standards@ or private).
-
jonas’
sounds both good :)
-
jonas’
though, linikng to the discussion would mainly be meant for the author to understand the change
-
jonas’
in this case, asking for a link is thus not necessary
-
mdosch
But if there exists an discussion on a mailing list linking it might be good for future reference ('why did we do this change back in 2020?'), right? So it's not necessary but kindly asking for a link if existing can't do any harm and might be useful I think.
-
jonas’
mdosch, yes, but this is not the place
-
jonas’
it would have to be linked in the document itself
-
jonas’
finding the PR for a given change is non-trivial
-
mdosch
Ok, thanks for the clarification. :)