XSF Editor Team - 2020-11-12

So you would suggest the author to create a MR per ProtoXEP or leave it up to them?

Also, is `ProtoXEP: Title of the new XEP` instead of `XEP-XXXX: Title of the new XEP` an issue? Don't know whether I'm too strict when I ask to change that or not. :)

Re https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1003/files#diff-512dc13f3a81200a9c2fb1f66bfe27878c31f5aea42eabdfcda98d85c5f423daR32 → I am not aware that we have a policy on that, but I would welcome it if we could aggree that the shortname is either NOT_YET_ASSIGNED or assigned a unique shortname. I always wanted to add a lint check for that, would that be aggreeable?

Sounds reasonable. Especially because it's like that in the template and I see no reason to change it until one is assigned… ✏

mdosch, if you don’t find anything to complain about, leaving it as-is is ok

(re proto xep splitting)

flow, agreed-ish

though I find the concept of trying to assign shortnames to XEPs a bit strange anyway

I think the concept of shortnames for XEPs is great, but I would swap shortnames and numbers, i.e. shortnames should be the suffix of the XEP and a XEP number just something that is hidden in XEP the metadata ✏

XEP-0199 vs XEP-PING

> mdosch, if you don’t find anything to complain about, leaving it as-is is ok > (re proto xep splitting) Thanks And regarding the subject?

subject?

title of the PR?

add a `ProtoXEPs:` prefix and it’s good to go

> subject? > title of the PR? Yes > add a `ProtoXEPs:` prefix and it’s good to go It has this one. It's just that triaging docs say `XEP-xxxx` but I read your answer as 'ProtoXEP is also ok.' 😃

oh, I’ve always used ProtoXEP

ha, that’s a bug in the docs I think

I do prefer ProtoXEP over XEP-XXXX because it’s easier to distinguish from any other XEP-#### PR

Ha. 😃

I got so many questions today… :D If someone wants a certain pr merged after another pr. Do we add some "blocked by pr-xyz" or so? Also is this a reasonable way to have a quick syntax check? `xmllint --noout --dtdvalid inbox/xep.dtd inbox/stickers.xml`

I feel I was causing unnecessary trouble when I thought I would make things easier. Sorry for that.