mdoschSo you would suggest the author to create a MR per ProtoXEP or leave it up to them?
mdoschAlso, is `ProtoXEP: Title of the new XEP` instead of `XEP-XXXX: Title of the new XEP` an issue? Don't know whether I'm too strict when I ask to change that or not. :)
flowRe https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1003/files#diff-512dc13f3a81200a9c2fb1f66bfe27878c31f5aea42eabdfcda98d85c5f423daR32 → I am not aware that we have a policy on that, but I would welcome it if we could aggree that the shortname is either NOT_YET_ASSIGNED or assigned a unique shortname. I always wanted to add a lint check for that, would that be aggreeable?
mdoschSounds reasonable. Especially it's like that in the template and I see no reason to change it until one is assigned…
mdoschSounds reasonable. Especially because it's like that in the template and I see no reason to change it until one is assigned…
jonas’mdosch, if you don’t find anything to complain about, leaving it as-is is ok
jonas’(re proto xep splitting)
jonas’flow, agreed-ish
jonas’though I find the concept of trying to assign shortnames to XEPs a bit strange anyway
flowI think the concept is great, but I would swap shortnames and numbers, i.e. shortnames should be the suffix of the XEP and a XEP number just something that is hidden in XEP the metadata
flowI think the concept of shortnames for XEPs is great, but I would swap shortnames and numbers, i.e. shortnames should be the suffix of the XEP and a XEP number just something that is hidden in XEP the metadata
flowXEP-0199 vs XEP-PING
mdosch> mdosch, if you don’t find anything to complain about, leaving it as-is is ok
> (re proto xep splitting)
Thanks
And regarding the subject?
soulhas joined
jonas’subject?
jonas’title of the PR?
jonas’add a `ProtoXEPs:` prefix and it’s good to go
mdosch> subject?
> title of the PR?
Yes
> add a `ProtoXEPs:` prefix and it’s good to go
It has this one. It's just that triaging docs say `XEP-xxxx` but I read your answer as 'ProtoXEP is also ok.' 😃
Kevhas left
jonas’oh, I’ve always used ProtoXEP
jonas’ha, that’s a bug in the docs I think
jonas’I do prefer ProtoXEP over XEP-XXXX because it’s easier to distinguish from any other XEP-#### PR
mdoschHa. 😃
soulhas left
soulhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
mdoschI got so many questions today… :D If someone wants a certain pr merged after another pr. Do we add some "blocked by pr-xyz" or so? Also is this a reasonable way to have a quick syntax check? `xmllint --noout --dtdvalid inbox/xep.dtd inbox/stickers.xml`
Kevhas joined
Kevhas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
Kevhas joined
lnjhas left
Tobihas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
larmaI feel I was causing unnecessary trouble when I thought I would make things easier. Sorry for that.