XSF Editor Team - 2023-01-11

council just voted in favor of issuing an LC for XEP-0390, where do we throw this? editor@xmpp.org, github issue, or is here fine?

What would you have asked for?

"please issue an LC for '390"

I'd have thought github issue would be ideal, and editor@ mail would be fine, and here wouldn't be optimal.

i.e. change to Proposed, send email

okay, github issue it is then

Ta.

And hope Peter doesn't hate that idea :)

https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/1263

Ta muchly.

btw if such things should go through tweet and toots we can arrange

Kev: I see you sprinkled some "Ready To Merge" labels. this one is missing :) https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1188

Ta. I didn't clear all the backlog, I just went through and did the first few as I had time.

I'm having a look at https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1234 which I thought was merged shtml links removal. It seems an older version of the branch has been merged and versions were changed to 1.1 for 0019 and 0148, instead of 1.0.1

4d763ee88506242da67554df41456bea985ebfd1 and 56c6de9da4eee1b57b112e5bdeaa0a830a033ac1

I can fix that in a new PR. I might also slip in a fix that Link Mauve pointed out (mismatched links)

Looks like I actually pushed on the same PR, sorry for the confusion.

I've no idea how that managed to go wrong, but we can't unpublish version 1.1 now, I think we're stuck with it.

Ah, hmm.

Mostly for the attic and all right? because it'd be annoying to go in there manually to remove files

I wasn't thinking of technical issues, I was just thinking that if 1.1 is 'in the wild', we can't unpublish it and pretend it didn't happen, because people might have seen it/fetched it/whatever.

0019 and 0148?

And it's not like it "never happened", it's all these in the git history

I guess it's unlikely that it matters for those particular XEPs, you're right.

But ok it's not like these were important changes either

I think Council should decide how to fix it, if at all, though, I don't want to make a unilateral decision.

Sure