-
moparisthebest
MattJ, jonas’ I pushed the language update to https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1255 if you want to have another look
-
moparisthebest
so I'm trying to look at putting <approver> in the 205 xeps that are missing it, but I have some questions...
-
moparisthebest
these are the unique types of XEPs that are missing approvers, one I think/hope is obvious who should approver be, but what about the rest? <type>Historical</type> <type>Humorous</type> <type>Informational</type> <type>SIG Formation</type> <type>Standards Track</type> - Council here
-
moparisthebest
157 are Standards Track so that's easy
-
moparisthebest
this fixes 154, I'm assuming you do not want any versions bumped https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1265✎ -
moparisthebest
this fixes all 157, I'm assuming you do not want any versions bumped https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1265 ✏
-
emus
moparisthebest: thank you a lot!
-
Kev
> this fixes all 157, I'm assuming you do not want any versions bumped https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1265 *Technically* any change to a XEP should get a patch (editorial) version bump, but as this isn't a change to the content of the XEP, only the metadata, I think skipping is pragmatic. Thanks.
-
Kev
FWIW, I imagine it's Peter or me who's going to deal with merging it. Jonas has retired as Editor, and Matt is involved in the tooling side.
-
jonas’
I'll also check in on tooling stuff, fwiw
-
jonas’
if people ask kindly, anyway :)
-
Kev
Thanks Jonas.
-
moparisthebest
Yea it's kinda more related to tooling, right now that triage script handles the case where approver is missing and it'd be nice to remove that
-
moparisthebest
If anyone can say what approver belongs on those other types I'll fix them too