MattJ, jonas’ I pushed the language update to https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1255 if you want to have another look
so I'm trying to look at putting <approver> in the 205 xeps that are missing it, but I have some questions...
these are the unique types of XEPs that are missing approvers, one I think/hope is obvious who should approver be, but what about the rest?
<type>Standards Track</type> - Council here
157 are Standards Track so that's easy
this fixes 154, I'm assuming you do not want any versions bumped https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1265✎
this fixes all 157, I'm assuming you do not want any versions bumped https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1265 ✏
MSavoritias (fae,ve)has joined
moparisthebest: thank you a lot!
> this fixes all 157, I'm assuming you do not want any versions bumped https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1265
*Technically* any change to a XEP should get a patch (editorial) version bump, but as this isn't a change to the content of the XEP, only the metadata, I think skipping is pragmatic. Thanks.
FWIW, I imagine it's Peter or me who's going to deal with merging it. Jonas has retired as Editor, and Matt is involved in the tooling side.
I'll also check in on tooling stuff, fwiw
if people ask kindly, anyway :)
Link Mauvehas joined
Yea it's kinda more related to tooling, right now that triage script handles the case where approver is missing and it'd be nice to remove that
If anyone can say what approver belongs on those other types I'll fix them too