IoT SIG - 2019-09-05

  1. Alacer has joined
  2. Alacer has left
  3. Alacer has joined
  4. Alacer has left
  5. Alacer has joined
  6. Alacer has left
  7. Alacer has joined
  8. Alacer has left
  9. Alacer has joined
  10. Alacer has left
  11. Alacer has joined
  12. patrik has joined
  13. Tobi has joined
  14. flow MattJ, I think this is an accurate description and the conlusion that XMPP is not a good fit for that setup. I do believe however that things will get more capable, if some of them aren't already, to run XMPP on it. Think for example a smart wifi-enabled power outlet. I do believe that it could become an xmpp entity without the need of a manufacturer controled stack in between
  15. flow …good fit for *that* setup -is correct-
  16. Alacer has left
  17. Alacer has joined
  18. COM8 has joined
  19. COM8 has left
  20. COM8 has joined
  21. COM8 has left
  22. COM8 has joined
  23. patrik has left
  24. patrik has joined
  25. debacle has joined
  26. MattJ flow, I agree, a wifi-connected outlet is a decent candidate. But... there is still the question of "why?"
  27. MattJ A wifi-connected outlet would generally need to connect to some sort of a server in order to be useful
  28. MattJ Typically today those servers are run by the manufacturer, who also provides an app that communicates with the outlet(s) through that same service
  29. MattJ You could say that this service could/should be an XMPP service, fair enough - but I don't know exactly what the benefit is over the many other existing solutions
  30. COM8 has left
  31. MattJ Is every user expected to run their own XMPP service?
  32. MattJ or will people hook up their outlets to public services?
  33. debacle has left
  34. MattJ And this is still one narrow slice of the problem - I have specifically avoided wifi outlets due to things like this (I want everything to continue working without an internet connection, and I have achieved that)
  35. debacle has joined
  36. debacle has left
  37. flow MattJ, I'd expect that primarly such device whould use manufacturer owned and operated xmpp services
  38. flow and yes, those device should continue being operational even if there if you don't have any internet connectivity. I could imagine that xmpp link-local could be used for that (with some extensions)
  39. COM8 has joined
  40. COM8 MattJ, I will answer tomorrow. I don't have time right now ;)
  41. MattJ No rush :)
  42. COM8 has left
  43. Alacer has left
  44. Alacer has joined
  45. COM8 has joined
  46. COM8 has left
  47. COM8 has joined
  48. COM8 has left
  49. Syndace has left
  50. Syndace has joined
  51. COM8 has joined
  52. COM8 has left
  53. patrik has left
  54. patrik has joined
  55. patrik has left
  56. patrik has joined
  57. patrik has left
  58. Tobi has left