IoT SIG - 2020-01-15

  1. Vaulor has joined

  2. Vaulor has left

  3. Vaulor has joined

  4. Tobi has joined

  5. Alacer has left

  6. Alacer has joined

  7. Alacer has left

  8. COM8 has joined

  9. COM8

    debacle, yes I can hear you. I just don't use MUCs on mobile only on my PC

  10. COM8 has left

  11. COM8 has joined

  12. COM8 has left

  13. Alacer has joined

  14. Alacer has left

  15. Alacer has joined

  16. Alacer has left

  17. debacle has joined

  18. Alacer has joined

  19. Alacer has left

  20. debacle has left

  21. Alacer has joined

  22. debacle has joined

  23. nightmare has joined

  24. nightmare has left

  25. nightmare has joined

  26. Alacer has left

  27. Alacer has joined

  28. nightmare has left

  29. Alacer has left

  30. Alacer has joined

  31. Alacer has left

  32. jjrh

    someone wrote a esp8266/arduino library for XMPP didn't they?

  33. debacle

    Interesting: A paper compared AMQP, MQTT, XMPP, and ZeroMQ. Result: > Our conclusion therefore is twofold: We recommend ZeroMQ where a specifically tailored solution is needed and the effort of implementing missing features is acceptable. For settings where a readily available solution is necessary, we recommend MQTT or AMQP, depending on the expected message sizes, as there are several open source software solutions that can be used out of the box. ("Meeting IoT Platform Requirements with Open Pub/Sub Solutions", 2016) flow MattJ

  34. debacle has left

  35. MattJ

    Reasoning against XMPP?

  36. MattJ

    I've never actually been convinced that XMPP is interchangeable with AMQP

  37. jjrh

    AMQP seems drastically different than XMPP in terms of usecase and functionality

  38. MattJ


  39. MattJ

    But people always lump them together because "pubsub"

  40. debacle has joined

  41. debacle

    I just found it funny, that they put four protocols in the title, but only three in the conclusion.

  42. Tobi has left

  43. debacle has left

  44. debacle has joined

  45. debacle has left

  46. debacle has joined