tbh I don't know (personally) anyone that uses Slack so it is (was?) definitelly not geared towards them.
personal opinion - for me using `@` just *feels* natural
Wojtekhas left
alexishas left
alexishas joined
SouLhas left
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
Wojtekhas joined
Wojtekhas left
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
Yagizаhas joined
SouLhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
waqashas left
waqashas joined
paulhas joined
Yagizаhas left
wurstsalathas joined
waqashas left
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
MattJ
The good thing about 372 is that people can choose clients (or configure) what feels natural for them, rather than having "competing" highlight styles
defanorhas joined
paulhas left
strarhas left
strarhas joined
adrienhas left
adrienhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
paulhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
Guushas left
Guushas joined
sonnyhas left
rionhas left
rionhas joined
sonnyhas joined
larmahas left
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
larmahas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
debaclehas joined
Kevhas left
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
etahas left
etahas joined
jonas’
Link Mauve, slack, and discord and various other platforms, to be fair
Kevhas joined
Link Mauve
jonas’, sure, I just won’t list them all every time. :p
jonas’
fair
Yagizаhas joined
goffihas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
kikuchiyohas joined
pulkomandyhas left
strarhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
goffihas left
goffihas joined
serge90has left
kikuchiyohas left
kikuchiyohas joined
pulkomandyhas left
kikuchiyohas left
kikuchiyohas joined
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas left
jonas’
PSA to all implementors:
- In SASL PLAIN, the client must not call SASLprep on the auth data (username, password). This is the server’s job. (RFC 4616 §2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4616 )
- In SCRAM, the client MUST call SASLprep on the password (RFC 5802 §2) and SHOULD call it on the username while allowing for unassigned codepoints (RFC 5802 §5.1). The server MUST call SASLprep on the username (RFC 5802 §5.1).
It is the server’s responsibility to ensure that PLAIN data is properly SASLprep’d if PLAIN is offered together with SCRAM.
jonas’
this was discussed in prosody@, apparently we’ve got quite a few implementations which diverge from this behaviour.
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
pulkomandyhas left
Ge0rG
it'll be big fun to get out of this mess again
kikuchiyohas left
flow
jonas’, is there an issue if the client saslprep's when using plain?
jonas’
flow, if the backend on the server is for example a PHP user database with hashes which doesn’t SASLprep
flow
woudn't such a setup prevent sasl mechs that require client-side sasl prep?
jonas’
yes, but also for other reasons
jonas’
flow, you wouldn’t offer SCRAM then, because you don’t have the required server side data in that case
jonas’
only PLAIN
Ge0rG
I suppose that a server now needs to perform password checks on both the prepped and the unprepped value?
jonas’
I don’t think this is truly an issue for *most* deployments. I expect the deployments which implement SCRAM to do it right (but I may of course be wrong with that) and I expect issues only when PLAIN is involved
jonas’
e.g. when authenticating with PLAIN against a SCRAM store
jonas’
but that needs to be evaluated
jonas’
aaaand I was proven wrong
jonas’
yikes
pulkomandyhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
serge90has joined
kikuchiyohas left
debaclehas left
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
strarhas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
Guus
Some download stats of the previous release of Openfire in the release notes of the latest release, at https://discourse.igniterealtime.org/t/openfire-4-5-2-is-released for those interested in weird stats. Also, we did a new release.
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
Martin
>openfire_4_5_1_x64.exe 15170
oO
pulkomandyhas left
etahas left
etahas joined
pulkomandyhas joined
debaclehas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
Guus
Yeah, the userbase is Windows-heavy. I have no idea how much of these are individual downloads, scripted, etc, etc.
Zash
99.99999999% of downloads these days seem to be CI systems that download the world for each run
Zash
Top 1 downloader of Prosody is our CI
Zash
Reeeeeeally need to make it push based instead of having it poll constantly
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
pulkomandyhas left
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
kikuchiyohas joined
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
kikuchiyohas left
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
SouLhas left
SouLhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas left
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
kikuchiyohas joined
pulkomandyhas joined
lovetoxhas joined
debaclehas left
kikuchiyohas left
kikuchiyohas joined
pulkomandyhas left
kikuchiyohas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
lovetoxhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
amnesiahas joined
flowhas left
amnesiahas left
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
Wojtekhas joined
Bartekhas joined
lovetoxhas joined
Bartekhas left
Bartekhas joined
pulkomandyhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
Bartekhas left
pulkomandyhas left
flowhas joined
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
amnesiahas joined
kikuchiyohas left
strarhas left
strarhas joined
goffihas left
alexishas left
goffihas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
kikuchiyohas left
pulkomandyhas left
kikuchiyohas joined
lovetoxhas left
pulkomandyhas joined
kikuchiyohas left
Bartekhas joined
lovetoxhas joined
Bartekhas left
kikuchiyohas joined
amnesiahas left
kikuchiyohas left
jonas’
odd causalities (and casualties). Our discussion about what’s valid in nodeprep / the domainpart of JIDs spilled over to #powerdns, and people started playing around and then https://docs.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2020-02.html happened