Oh, 452 has been announced yesterday but is not on the website list yet
jonas’
someone needs to kick the website build
Martinhas left
Martinhas joined
Zash
Kick it you say?
Martin
Does any client support XEP-0372 references yet?
stpeterhas joined
debaclehas joined
belonghas left
belonghas joined
stpeterhas left
Beherithas joined
stpeterhas joined
Stefanhas left
stefanhas left
stefanhas joined
Stefanhas joined
Beherithas left
Beherithas joined
Beherithas left
Beherithas joined
Beherithas left
Beherithas joined
Beherithas left
Beherithas joined
jonas’
converse may
Martin
Makes sense, as the prosody module for muc mention notifications is written by jcbrand.
mathieui
is there bikeshedding left on references or has that ended?
jonas’
I still don’t think that how it maps everything to a URI is a wise move
Kev
Possibly not. It’s not immediately clear what would be better, though.
jonas’
I made a proposal back then
jonas’
it was mostly lost in another iteration of the character counting bikeshed though: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2018-March/034559.html
Beherithas left
Beherithas joined
Kev
I’m not opposed to such a thing. I do think it would be nicer to be able to URI All The Thing.
Kev
I accept pragmatism may come before that.
Zash
Mmmmmmmm `<message to='xmpp:user@example.net'/>`
Sam Whited
It's not a fucking bike shed. The stupid way in which you're counting characters is entirely screwing me over while it's trivial to do it the other way
jonas’
Sam Whited, your stupid way of character counting would be entirely screwing me over, while it’s trivial the other way!!! (for me)
Sam Whited
It's not, I implemented it in python and Go both ways.
Sam Whited
But you constantly ignore my examples while demanding that I produce more examples and never producing any of your own. I'm sick of this community wielding the burden of proof as a weapon.
Sam Whited
(I don't mean "you" personally, I don't remember who all in that massive thread it was, FWIW)
Sam Whited
Anyways, done now, I don't know why I bother. We do all the same mistakes over and over again and just insist that it's fine.
Zash
I don't like the tone here.
Sam Whited
Yah, sorry, I need to leave this channel. Between this and DOAP I'm fucking furious and that's not okay in a public place, sorry.
jonas’
sorry, I was trying to be ironic
jonas’
(symbolised by a lot of `!`)
stpeter
hmm
pep.
I'm happy I haven't been following standards threads lately
flow
irony often doesn't work in text chats. it appears that counting codepoints is a middle ground and has consensus. I am still not convinced that counting grapheme clusters is necessarily wrong, since there is a least one programming language with build in support for this.
jonas’
> irony often doesn't work in text chats.
let’s bikeshed a protocol for that </i>
pep.
I'd use <p> for Poe, and insides include things like <i> for irony, <s> for sarcasm, etc. This way we could get to things like <p><s><i>Are you sure?</s></i></p>
flow
but since sometimes (often?) len_codepoints(input) == len_grapheme_clusters(input), I can settle with codepoints (or "starting" with codepoints ;))
Zash
XEP-0014
flow
seems like the bikeshed was already done
pep.
Zash, ITYM 007^W^Wnvm :-°
jonas’
Rejected though, flow
flow
pep., the key is to stay calm
flow
which is actually a good advice in any situation
flow
(even though, it is sometimes not easy)
flow
but getting emotional in a discussion is typically counter productive
Kev
flow: Fuck that.
;)
Zash
I miss Summit
jonas’
yes.
jonas’
Summit would’ve been great, especially after this straining year
Zash
Much too easy to get upset at a bunch of text on a screen than AFK faces.
Kev
I'm hoping someone's going to announce a remote summit, but I don't have the cycles to put into arranging one, so I'm not making noise about it.
Kev
Oh, I guess it would have been tomorrow and Friday if it was happening wouldn't it. Nevermind :)
flow
Kev, yep, sometimes that is tempting to write…
flowmisses summit too
Zash
Kev, why yes, the bystander effect working group will take care of it!
flow
I'd really like to hear some short presentations from every active xmpp project about what they are currently doing and did in the last eyar
Kev
Well, Summit's usually a Board-led thing, not just 'someone' :)
jonas’
SCAM I thought?
Kev
It's been Board in the past.
Kev
Maybe they've delegated to SCAM (but if they delegated, it's still a Board thing).
pep.
I feel that lately board has just been a routing utility to working groups
Zash
That's a valid thing for a board to do.
Kev
pep.: I think that's fine. Board doesn't have to do work, just set direction and ensure that work is done.
flow
well if there is a SCAM team, then it appears sensible to delgate it to them, no?