Do any widely implemented specs actually use XEP-0131: Stanza Headers and Internet Metadata?
gutuninghas left
pep.has left
pep.has joined
pep.has left
pep.has joined
florettahas joined
lovetoxhas joined
pep.has left
dezanthas joined
goffihas joined
goffihas left
goffihas joined
goffihas left
goffihas joined
lovetoxhas left
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
flow
xep332 maybe
flow
isn't the real question: is SHIM a good fit for your protocol and use case
flow
I do believe that there are some places where using SHIM is sensible, but in some cases it feels like re-using HTTP headers just for the sake of re-using HTTP headers. Which feels wrong (just like MUC initially re-used HTTP status codes)
moparisthebesthas left
moparisthebesthas joined
asterixhas left
asterixhas joined
asterixhas left
asterixhas joined
goffihas left
goffihas joined
Kevhas left
Kevhas joined
pep.has joined
asterixhas left
asterixhas joined
Sam
No, the question is exactly what I was asking :) "widely implemented" being the important part (so not XEP-0332 as far as I know)
mikeyehas joined
MattJ
I think that question is the wrong one to ask
MattJ
It may not be widely implemented, but I think it is valuable to have a standard way of expressing this data
The question is "is there anything I'm going to need later that depends on this and therefore I have to implement it?", it's the question I was trying to ask. If it's useful but unused I don't care for now.
Sam
0060 is a good one and I didn't know or remember that it was using this; thanks
x51has joined
gutuninghas left
mikeyehas left
goffihas left
Kiwihas left
x51has left
x51has joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
squeakylatexhas joined
kikuchiyohas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
xeckshas left
xeckshas joined
gutuninghas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
Kiwihas joined
lovetoxhas joined
marc0shas left
kikuchiyohas left
marc0shas joined
kikuchiyohas joined
gutuninghas left
alex-a-sotohas left
alex-a-sotohas joined
asterixhas left
asterixhas joined
stpeterhas joined
dezanthas left
lovetoxhas left
southerntofuhas joined
dezanthas joined
stpeterhas left
stpeterhas joined
gutuninghas joined
stpeterhas left
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
stpeterhas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
Martinhas left
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
Martinhas joined
Kevhas left
Kevhas joined
Kevhas left
Kevhas joined
Kevhas left
Kevhas joined
gutuninghas left
gutuninghas joined
gutuninghas left
lovetoxhas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
marc0shas left
marc0shas joined
FireFlyhas left
FireFlyhas joined
FireFlyhas left
FireFlyhas joined
pep.has left
dezanthas left
dezanthas joined
Kevhas left
Kevhas joined
Kevhas left
Kevhas joined
Kevhas left
Kevhas joined
Yagizаhas left
alacerhas joined
pep.has joined
alacerhas left
Wojtekhas left
goffihas joined
paulhas left
paulhas joined
Yagizаhas joined
gutuninghas joined
pep.has left
alacerhas joined
debaclehas joined
alacerhas left
alacerhas joined
marchas left
jonas’
I think '60 is the reason why aioxmpp has shims for SHIM
gutuninghas left
marchas joined
emus
Hi,
general question: Shouldnt we give the chat a proper name if it was intended to be a landibg zone for newcomers?