-
Martin
Moving here from prosody@. jonas’: Do you think this would be sufficient? https://paste.debian.net/1205341/
-
jonas’
Martin, what about <foo:proceed xmlns:foo='urn:....'/>?
-
Zash
we don't do that here.jpg
-
jonas’
Martin, what about <failed/> as opposed to any other random garbage you might get? :)
-
Zash
fail-tls.badxmpp.eu ?
-
Martin
Ok, checking for failed would be easy. Not sure about the foo.
-
Martin
Can I haz foo.badxmpp.eu?
-
Zash
Martin, xml prefix stuff?
-
moparisthebest
what about break-ejabberd.badxmpp.eu that sends `<features xmlns="http://etherx.jabber.org/streams"><starttls xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-tls"><required/></starttls></features>` instead of `<stream:features><starttls xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-tls"><required/></starttls></stream:features>` :D
-
Zash
Uh
-
moparisthebest
(prosody is fine with either)
-
Zash
!praise libexpat
-
Zash
moparisthebest, surprisingly easy (I say, before testing)
-
Zash
xmpp:unprefixed-features.badxmpp.eu
-
moparisthebest
ha, awesome, now that's some quick turnaround
-
Link Mauve
Can I haz xmpp:unprefixed-stream.badxmpp.eu too?
-
Zash
Trickier
-
Zash
Would need to find a point much earlier when that's accessible and can be overridden
-
Martin
Zash: > Martin, xml prefix stuff? If this is used somewhere it might be handy to check whether implementations cope with it.