jdev - 2021-08-25


  1. stpeter has left
  2. stpeter has joined
  3. DebXWoody has joined
  4. DebXWoody has left
  5. larma has joined
  6. stpeter has left
  7. laylolamb has left
  8. stpeter has joined
  9. mikeye has left
  10. laylolamb has joined
  11. jgart has left
  12. stpeter has left
  13. Pete has joined
  14. mikeye has joined
  15. Sam Working on another ad-hoc implementation and decided whomever said that he thing about multiple payloads meant you were only supposed to display one and fallback if you don't support that payload type must be correct. Except then it starts talking about things with the same priority and that makes no sense and I still have no idea how any of this is supposed to work (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
  16. mac has left
  17. Sam > The requester SHOULD consider those elements qualified by the same namespace as having an equivalent precedence (such as if multiple "jabber:x:oob" elements are included). If anyone has any idea what that sentence means I'd be grateful. If I have <oob/><form/><oob/> am I supposed to parse out the two OOBs and show them both? Pick one at random? I have no idea.
  18. jgart has joined
  19. dezant has left
  20. dezant has joined
  21. mikeye has left
  22. Yagizа has joined
  23. stpeter has joined
  24. FireFly has left
  25. Vaulor has joined
  26. stpeter has left
  27. dezant has left
  28. dezant has joined
  29. dezant has left
  30. DebXWoody has joined
  31. selurvedu has left
  32. dezant has joined
  33. suohua has joined
  34. suohua has left
  35. spectrum has left
  36. norayr has left
  37. norayr has joined
  38. 9lakes has joined
  39. laylolamb has left
  40. laylolamb has joined
  41. mikeye has joined
  42. dezant has left
  43. _Liveware Problem_ has joined
  44. mikeye has left
  45. dezant has joined
  46. COM8 has joined
  47. wurstsalat has joined
  48. FireFly has joined
  49. mikeye has joined
  50. COM8 has left
  51. Syndace has joined
  52. debacle has joined
  53. spectrum has joined
  54. goffi has joined
  55. marc has joined
  56. mac has joined
  57. mac has left
  58. mac has joined
  59. debacle has left
  60. noob has joined
  61. mac has left
  62. noob test something
  63. noob can anyone receive my message?
  64. wurstsalat noob, yes
  65. stpeter has joined
  66. noob has left
  67. debacle has joined
  68. stpeter has left
  69. me9 has joined
  70. jgart has left
  71. emus has joined
  72. emus > southerntofu escribió: > emus, you'd like to remove XMPP from the name or? no, jdev is a bit short
  73. mikeye has left
  74. southerntofu emus, agreed!
  75. southerntofu > the responder SHOULD respond with a 403 "Forbidden" error (XEP-0050) <-- are HTTP status codes a thing in XMPP? never seen it elsewhere
  76. jonas’ southerntofu, then I recomend you read RFC 3920 ;)
  77. jonas’ oh, it's not even in there
  78. jonas’ then it must be even more ancient
  79. Alex has left
  80. southerntofu yeah that's what i thought XMPP Core defines error types not codes :)
  81. jonas’ haha what
  82. jonas’ RFC 3920 mentions that the schema in RFC 3921 defines a code attribute for backward compat
  83. jonas’ it is defined as a byte though, so maximum 255
  84. jonas’ which makes absolutely no sense for how error codes are *actually* seen in the wild
  85. southerntofu oO
  86. jonas’ in 2015 or so I was still getting code='401' from some ejabberd deployment I think :)
  87. Sam has left
  88. stpeter has joined
  89. stpeter has left
  90. Alex has joined
  91. norayr has left
  92. norayr has joined
  93. georgeorwell has joined
  94. southerntofu Sam, yeah that's really unclear. i just read the hwole spec just to gather more context.. i guess it would require to survey existing client/server implementations to see what they do and update the spec accordingly
  95. Sam has joined
  96. mac has joined
  97. me9 has left
  98. me9 has joined
  99. lovetox has left
  100. Alex has left
  101. mac has left
  102. Sam southerntofu: thanks for the help, glad it's not just me
  103. inky has joined
  104. mac has joined
  105. inky has left
  106. inky has joined
  107. me9 > I wrote: > Which xmpp.org muc is the most fitting to ask about and discuss XEPs? This one? Any idea?
  108. jonas’ me9, xmpp:xsf@muc.xmpp.org?join
  109. me9 jonas’: Thank you.
  110. jonas’ I missed your question over the day change, sorry :)
  111. me9 No problem.
  112. inky has left
  113. antranigv has left
  114. antranigv has joined
  115. inky has joined
  116. kikuchiyo has joined
  117. kikuchiyo has left
  118. kikuchiyo has joined
  119. antranigv has left
  120. antranigv has joined
  121. Alex has joined
  122. antranigv has left
  123. x51 has joined
  124. antranigv has joined
  125. norayr has left
  126. norayr has joined
  127. Wojtek has joined
  128. norayr has left
  129. norayr has joined
  130. antranigv has left
  131. kikuchiyo has left
  132. antranigv has joined
  133. kikuchiyo has joined
  134. Alex has left
  135. aram has joined
  136. mac has left
  137. mac has joined
  138. kikuchiyo has left
  139. antranigv has left
  140. antranigv has joined
  141. hiran has joined
  142. jgart has joined
  143. kikuchiyo has joined
  144. laylolamb has left
  145. laylolamb has joined
  146. lovetox has joined
  147. norayr has left
  148. norayr has joined
  149. norayr has left
  150. inky has left
  151. norayr has joined
  152. antranigv has left
  153. antranigv has joined
  154. hiran has left
  155. antranigv has left
  156. antranigv has joined
  157. lovetox has left
  158. antranigv has left
  159. antranigv has joined
  160. norayr has left
  161. norayr has joined
  162. antranigv has left
  163. antranigv has joined
  164. antranigv has left
  165. antranigv has joined
  166. antranigv has left
  167. _Liveware Problem_ has left
  168. stpeter has joined
  169. Sam I am starting a list of open question about ad-hoc commands because this entire XEP is extremely confusing to me. I'll try to clarify / fix the XEP later. If you have anything to add, I would appreciate it: https://pad.disroot.org/p/adhocquestions
  170. mac has left
  171. Alex has joined
  172. Alex has left
  173. Alex has joined
  174. antranigv has joined
  175. marc has left
  176. marc has joined
  177. marmistrz has left
  178. marc has left
  179. marc has joined
  180. marmistrz has joined
  181. dezant has left
  182. dezant has joined
  183. marc has left
  184. lovetox has joined
  185. marc has joined
  186. Matrix Traveler (bot) has left
  187. homebeach has left
  188. Server Stats Discoverer (traveler bot) has left
  189. Matrix Traveler (bot) has joined
  190. homebeach has joined
  191. Server Stats Discoverer (traveler bot) has joined
  192. dezant has left
  193. dezant has joined
  194. Link Mauve has left
  195. rom1dep has left
  196. ralphm has left
  197. ralphm has joined
  198. me9 has left
  199. scorch has left
  200. rom1dep has joined
  201. dezant has left
  202. antranigv has left
  203. antranigv has joined
  204. lovetox has left
  205. antranigv has left
  206. scorch has joined
  207. xecks has left
  208. xecks has joined
  209. lovetox has joined
  210. dezant has joined
  211. ralphm has left
  212. ralphm has joined
  213. Yagizа has left
  214. antranigv has joined
  215. antranigv has left
  216. antranigv has joined
  217. Sam has left
  218. Sam has joined
  219. laylolamb has left
  220. dezant has left
  221. laylolamb has joined
  222. me9 has joined
  223. laylolamb has left
  224. laylolamb has joined
  225. Pete has left
  226. dezant has joined
  227. Pete has joined
  228. hiran has joined
  229. Wojtek has left
  230. debacle has left
  231. x51 has left
  232. Sam Are there any common payload types that get used in ad-hoc commands other than those defined in the XEP?
  233. jonas’ those defined in the xep == data forms?
  234. Zash Isn't there some hints that you could have pretty much any payload in place of datafroms?
  235. Zash > The payload can be elements in any namespace that makes sense and is understood [...]
  236. Sam data forms, notes, and oob I think are in the XEP
  237. Sam I was just wondering if anyone had seen anything else in the wild
  238. Zash I don't think so
  239. Sam Excellent
  240. Zash The thought of using 432 or 335 occurred at some point, but thankfully I never actually did such a thing
  241. debacle has joined
  242. goffi has left
  243. mac has joined
  244. hiran has left
  245. Zash has left
  246. Zash has joined
  247. Zash has left
  248. Zash has joined
  249. Zash has left
  250. Zash has joined
  251. georgeorwell has left
  252. mac has left
  253. _Liveware Problem_ has joined
  254. laylolamb has left
  255. mac has joined
  256. laylolamb has joined
  257. mac has left
  258. mac has joined
  259. 9lakes has left
  260. marc has left
  261. mac has left
  262. mac has joined
  263. Matrix Traveler (bot) has left
  264. homebeach has left
  265. Server Stats Discoverer (traveler bot) has left
  266. Matrix Traveler (bot) has joined
  267. homebeach has joined
  268. Server Stats Discoverer (traveler bot) has joined
  269. xecks has left
  270. _Liveware Problem_ has left
  271. wurstsalat has left
  272. laylolamb has left
  273. laylolamb has joined
  274. debacle has left
  275. dezant has left
  276. dezant has joined
  277. emus has left
  278. me9 has left
  279. dezant has left
  280. kikuchiyo has left
  281. 9lakes has joined
  282. dezant has joined
  283. dezant has left
  284. dezant has joined