jdev - 2022-04-25

Anyone aware of any instance using that expired intermediate LE chain?

Since it's the default chain, I'd imagine most

Including all Snikket instances

Hm. I'm after something that will fail validation.

Ask movim.eu to rollback changes :P

Hi! I have a XEP-0045 (MUC) related question. Can I under the same stream:stream subscribe to many groupchat presences that are the same MUC room, but with different nicknames?

If so, how do I send messages as a specific nickname? http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#message does not set the nickname in the `to` attribute. Can I set it?

I'm pretty sure the answer to the first question is "no"

Oh, makes sense, thanks. So I'd have to create many c2s connections to the server to do that? I'm implementing a simple IRC-XMPP bridge with libstrophe. Does anyone know how is this done in other bridges (apart from those that just prefix the message with the nick)?

Unless your server supports binding multiple JIDs to the same stream, which I think we did a way with long ago.

Or if the server acts as multiple entities for your when talking to the MUC

But that may not be implemented anywhere

Use a component connection (XEP-0114), then you can use anything@component.example/anything

This looks promising. I'll look into it.

Anton L. Šijanec, you are aware of biboumi?

ha true, there are implementations here and there :)

( https://biboumi.louiz.org/ )

That'll probably serve my needs, thanks! Though I assume this is more like a irc client than a bridge - bridging the other way around (access an existing mux) is not possible.

You can combine it with this: https://git.sr.ht/~singpolyma/cheogram-muc-bridge

That will allow bridging an existing MUC with an existing IRC channel

Nice!