jdev - 2022-08-15


  1. Millesimus

    Gosh, that was some backlog…

  2. Millesimus

    MattJ: > The document is the specification Thing is, there is a difference between the opus and the ideas and behind it. Copyright only protects the opus, meaning a specific way of putting things, like in a book. For example, I am not allowed to distribute a copy of a "Harry Potter" book, since the text in that book is copyrighted. But I might freely and publicly talk about its characters, storylines, and everything as such abstract concepts cannot be subject to copyright. However, they could be trademarked (names, logos, sth like this) and patented (ideas how to do stuff). And I think that's what was meant here. The specification document might have a copyright, but the specification as an idea of how to do things cannot (and thus cannot be "public domain", as this is a concept of copyright).

  3. lovetox

    yes thats how i understand it, text -> copyright, ideas -> patents

  4. lovetox

    there are no patents, and the text is public domain for 5+ years

  5. lovetox

    i would be very suprised if anyone accepts a patent after ideas are in public domain for more than 5+ years

  6. MattJ

    Millesimus: yes, this is exactly my point. Trademark and patents don't apply (already established if you read back), and neither does copyright. Which leaves what legal concerns?

  7. MattJ

    We already (in this long conversation) discussed the copyright of the spec and the implementation (libsignal) separately, because they are different

  8. MattJ

    And yet it's apparently still claimed that via some vague unspecified legal means, Signal still have some way to prevent people using OMEMO... ??

  9. Millesimus

    > And yet it's apparently still claimed that via some vague unspecified legal means, Signal still have some way to prevent people using OMEMO... ?? Don't think so either. In the cited case against Wire, they just demanded attribution (or money, purportedly).

  10. MattJ

    edhelas, does Movim depend on private XML support? (e.g. for user settings)

  11. edhelas

    MattJ yup

  12. MattJ

    Okay, that probably explains a recent report about it not working properly on a Snikket server

  13. edhelas

    Might move that to some private Pep node 🤔 the code is there for like 8 years