jdev - 2022-09-16

I don't see why there would be really; there's no implicit ordering so it doesn't seem worth defining one explicitly just to satisfy more traits. I suspect any useful ordering would be extremely context dependent.

pep., you have equality defined on JIDs, so that foo™@BAR and Footm@bar will compare as equal, that’s it.

pep., you could normalize jids and then order by the bytes you get when you encode them in utf-8?

but I never was in the situation where I needed an ordering

what I needed, and jxmpp provides, are relations like "Jid.isChildOf(Jid)" and "Jid.isParentOf(Jid)"

The only XEPs I know which define an ordering are XEP-0115 and XEP-0390, for normaisation reasons.

But they treat every attribute as text, doesn’t matter if it’s a JID or a boolean.

flow, for full → bare → domain relations?

Link Mauve, exactly