jdev - 2022-10-31

  1. MattJ

    lovetox: I think that would be sensible, yes

  2. lovetox

    ok great, the RFC is sadly pretty weird on that one

  3. lovetox

    it links to some SASL stuff and says client needs to check the identity, but there is no clear sentence that says how a server needs to set the from attr in the response

  4. lovetox

    for c2s, for s2s its very strict

  5. adx

    is there some magic needed for an OOB message to be interpreted as sent file?

  6. Ge0rG

    adx: yes. Most cliens will require that the message body equals the oob URL

  7. Sam

    We really need to fix that…

  8. Zash

    Waiting for Conversations 3 ?

  9. edhelas

    Soon ™

  10. adx

    Ge0rG: yeah, that worked

  11. adx

    intuitive heh

  12. pep.

    adx: have you seen sfs? 0447. In case you could do both

  13. adx

    yeah, i've seen it

  14. adx

    but from what i've gathered indicating file upload via OOB is the most commonly implemented method

  15. lovetox

    Sam: 0447 exists. So we just need to migrate

  16. lovetox

    It's on my long list