jdev - 2022-11-16

  1. nicoco

    fead (if you come back): I don't understand the question, but SleekXMPP is not updated anymore, I would advice to use slixmpp, its successor

  2. nicoco

    I am trying to fill this doap.xml thingy for my gateway thingy. For some XEPs I don't know if it makes sense to include them as supported. For instance, I do nothing with carbons and MAM, but if the server my component is attached to support them, well... they work. Any guidance on how I should fill this?

  3. Zash

    Skipping them is fine in that case. An `<xmpp:note>` with comments is also fine.

  4. Zash

    In the Prosody DOAP I've included some things that are indirectly supported, like PEP payloads, so eh.

  5. nicoco

    no xmpp:status, no xmpp:version, just an xmpp:note is OK? that would be perfect I think

  6. Zash

    Hm, is there a status for "not implemented" ?

  7. Zash

    ... Link Mauve ?

  8. Zash

    A "indirectly supported" or "not directly relevant but not blocked" status might be handy

  9. Zash

    Or something in the XEPs themselves indicating relevance for clients, servers, transports, or combinations of those

  10. wurstsalat

    nicoco: `"https://linkmauve.fr/ns/xmpp-doap#category-component"` would be fitting status can be in 'complete', 'partial', 'planned', 'deprecated', 'removed' or 'wontfix'

  11. wurstsalat

    see https://linkmauve.fr/ns/xmpp-doap#

  12. Zash

    'wontfix' ... doesn't feel right, but might be closest

  13. nicoco

    Component category is fitting indeed. I would not want to give the idea that slidge is incompatible with these XEPs, "not-implemented" or "wontfix" sounds scary. I find carbons and MAM very useful… I guess I won't list them then.

  14. wurstsalat

    Zash: how would the compliancer handle this? ``` <implements> <xmpp:SupportedXep> <xmpp:xep rdf:resource="https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0280.html"/> <xmpp:note>Indirectly supported by the server the component is being hosted on</xmpp:note> </xmpp:SupportedXep> </implements> ```

  15. Zash

    Without checking the code, IIRC it will assume that status is 'complete' if absent

  16. wurstsalat

    that's alright I guess?

  17. Ghost

    hi, is it possible to use an external api to handle file upload in ejabberd ?

  18. Ghost

    basically, I want the file content( base64 or binary), name and or metadata, plus the room and id of the user posting it