-
nicoco
about Stateless Inline Media Sharing, cf https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0385.html#usecases-sending-photo it's not clear to me if the <media-sharing> element *has* to be a child of a <reference xmlns='urn:xmpp:reference:0'> tag or if it's OK if it's a direct child of <message>. I would think it's OK since examples are non normative and the text does not mention this <reference> but maybe I'm wrong?
-
lovetox
nicoco, this XEP is probably not going to be adpoted
-
lovetox
rather look at https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0447.html
-
lovetox
but its all very experimental there are maybe 1 or 2 clients who support this only in parts
-
nicoco
movim and cheogram android already implement 0385. I'll probably add 0447 too, to please all clients devs' tastes :) I have no opinion on which one is better.
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
Eh the 0447 says it doesnt support support body. That sounds bad for accessibility
-
MattJ
MSavoritias (fae,ve): why so?
-
MattJ
The current approach is the one that's bad for accessibility
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
Because correct me if i am wrong but: If I want to send a picture with an image description for people who cant see how would i do it?
-
MattJ
There is a description element
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
So that the client can read the description instead of the image based on user preferences
-
MattJ
<desc>
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
Ah it was in the file metadata xep. Makes sense.
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
Like pointing to it i mean
-
Beherit
Kind reminder if anyone wants to throw their projects at thr beamer when we are at fosdem 🎥🎥🎥
-
Kev
We support SIMS in upcoming Swift stuff, FWIW.