jdev - 2024-07-30

% was already widely in use anyway

%2540 you say?

(as a substitute for @ in the node part)

how about `🥝️40`

debacle, consider the combination with URI

It's too late anyway. We implemented everything according to the XEP. But we feel dirty now.

We show `@` at UI level, so in most cases users stay clean.

what did you say, deb%255c40cle?

> how about `🥝️40` Very insensitive to people allergic to kiwifruits, obviously.

Just use sheep-escaping of the kiwi. `🐑:kiwi:40`

deb␛40cle?

I like what sip does, where the Uri form is the main form, so you can just use Uri escaping

I'm so so so so very much hoping that sheep-escaping is really a thing instead of something that you just made up.

unescaping will be called "wake up"

> > how about `🥝️40` > Very insensitive to people allergic to kiwifruits, obviously. I thought about `🥥️40`, but that is pretty contentious in the US right now. ↺

> I'm so so so so very much hoping that sheep-escaping is really a thing instead of something that you just made up. Of course it is: https://nypost.com/2023/02/28/7-sheep-escape-nj-slaughterhouse-will-live-at-sanctuary/ ↺

Yey! All’s wool that ends wool.

Beginners question: If I have a web client and want to display only new, unread messages, I have to use 0333?

I don't want to rely on local storage for keeping track of read state.

XEP-0333: Displayed Markers

New xep mds

singpolyma What's "mds"?

https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/xep-mds.html

It has a number now iirc ✏

I see. Do I need any server support other than PEP?

0490

No, just pep

Nice!

The hot stuff conversations already uses: Edit : here is it noe it seems https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0490.html ✏