-
Schimon
> we have multiple terminal clients, guess what they cannot display images .. lovetox. To inform you. Terminals such as Kitty can display images. I have tried Kitty for the first time, a couple of days ago. But I understand the concept that you convey, which is unrelated to my comment. ↺
-
Schimon
> lovetox: no longer true https://github.com/hackerb9/lsix 😁 moparisthebest. Thank you for sharing this link. ↺
-
Schimon
https://github.com/danielknobe/blobbyvolley2/issues/149 XMPP as a platform to connect with friend and peers (A video game in C++)
-
Schimon
Suppose one is playing a video game which connects to XMPP. What type of groupchat is more fit to publish invitations for peers to play, MIX or MUC?✎ -
Schimon
Suppose one is playing a video game which connects to XMPP. What type of groupchat is more fit to publish invitations for peers to play, MIX or MUC? ✏
-
Schimon
Suppose one is playing a video game which connects to XMPP. What type of groupchat is more fit to publish invitations for peers to play? (MIX or MUC) ✏
-
MattJ
MUC? :)
-
moparisthebest
Schimon: I would pick the one that exists (:
-
Schimon
What is better?
-
moparisthebest
The one that exists
-
Schimon
Aha✎ -
Schimon
I understand. ✏
-
Schimon
I am interested in utilizing PubSub, and as I was informed that it is possible to add PubSub nodes to JIDs of MUC, so I suppose MUC would be good. Yet, suppose we choose MIX, I guess that when developers would see that it is useful, they would support MIX.
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
MIX is basically the pubsub concept to groupchats if that helps
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
MUC is something else. its not pubsub by itself
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
it has been extended to mimic certain pubsub things tho afaik
-
Schimon
We would have to start with one of them, so I suppose once someone implements PubSub with MUC, then the transfer to MIX would be faster.
-
Schimon
Pardon. I am off topic!
-
Schimon
MUC. Period.
-
Schimon
MUC and PubSub is something of another context.
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
PubSub with MUC is MIX yes. you basically NIH MIX at that point
-
Schimon
Pardon. What does NIH mean?
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
Not Invented Here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here
-
singpolyma
I think Schimon means PEP on MUC jids not something mix like
-
Schimon
If attaching PubSub node `urn:xmpp:microbloggin:0` to MUC means PEP; Then, yes.
-
singpolyma
PEP means using a jid that isn't otherwise a pubsub service as if it is a pubsub service. It used to also mean restrictions on pubsub features but less and less these days and it does also mean support for +notify I guess
-
Schimon
Yes. This is what I want!
-
Kev
Well, PEP means pubsub on a user's JID with a minimum set of features and some sensible defaults.
-
Kev
If you put pubsub on a MUC it's not PEP by definition, but doing similar things makes a lot of sense.
-
singpolyma
I don't see how "it's not pep by definition" but sure
-
Boyaroslav
Hi, what us jabber?
-
Boyaroslav
This person attempted to retract a previous message, but it's unsupported by your client.
-
Boyaroslav
Hi, what is jabber?
-
Guus
Jabber is the name for the XMPP protocol before it got standardized.
-
Guus
It is also a trademark used for certain products created by Cisco.
-
Boyaroslav
Thank you
-
singpolyma
I would say jabber is the name of the openly federated network of servers which speak the xmpp protocol to each other
-
ubq323_
the channel gajim@conference.gajim.org is down. i can't connect to it.
-
ubq323_
sorry if this is the wrong place to post this
-
Kev
> I don't see how "it's not pep by definition" but sure Because PEP "enables a standard XMPP user account to function as a virtual pubsub service" :)
-
Guus
ubq323_: the room seems to work fine to me.
-
ubq323_
weird
-
ubq323_
i'm getting the error message 'service-unavailable' trying to connect
-
Zash
ubq323_, any more details? if you use Gajim or another client with an XML console, can you check what the full error stanza is, and try to find the stanza that it is an error response to?
-
ubq323_
``` <!-- Outgoing Fri 16 Aug 2024 16:06:21 BST (ubq323) --> <message xmlns="jabber:client" to="gajim@conference.gajim.org" type="chat" id="7f6533cc-dbc7-42ad-ab88-d4eaaad65fe0"> <body>test . gajim</body> <origin-id xmlns="urn:xmpp:sid:0" id="7f6533cc-dbc7-42ad-ab88-d4eaaad65fe0" /> <request xmlns="urn:xmpp:receipts" /> <markable xmlns="urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0" /> </message> <!-- Outgoing Fri 16 Aug 2024 16:06:21 BST (ubq323) --> <r xmlns="urn:xmpp:sm:3" /> <!-- Incoming Fri 16 Aug 2024 16:06:21 BST (ubq323) --> <message xmlns="jabber:client" from="gajim@conference.gajim.org" id="7f6533cc-dbc7-42ad-ab88-d4eaaad65fe0" xml:lang="en" to="ubq323@ubq323.website/gajim.ZT9F9J57" type="error"> <error type="cancel"> <service-unavailable xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas" /> </error> <stanza-id id="YLKdPctqZ81WdDVuzbTOZ79J" xmlns="urn:xmpp:sid:0" by="ubq323@ubq323.website" /> </message> ```
-
Zash
ubq323_, that's a regular 1:1 chat message, not a groupchat message or join
-
ubq323_
that's weird
-
ubq323_
i've tried exiting and rejoining the channel, same result
-
ubq323_
(yeah i'm using gajim client, by the way)
-
ubq323_
why might gajim think that this channel is an ordinary chat and not a groupchat?
-
Zash
Somehow Gajim has been confused into thinking that the channel is a regular user.
-
ubq323_
i see
-
Zash
Ping lovetox ?
-
lovetox
Only if the disco info does not say it's a muc
-
lovetox
Or if you maybe added the MUC to your roster
-
ubq323_
how would i remove it from my roster, if that was the case
-
lovetox
How do you try to "connect"