jdev - 2025-01-08

  1. Schimon

    Good day. I have posted a question to the Standards mailing-list about project Blasta and Atom Over XMPP (XEP-0277 (Libervia) and XEP-0472 (Movim)), and I would appreciate your advise. ✎

  2. Schimon

    Good day. I have posted a question to the Standards mailing-list about project Blasta and Atom Over XMPP (XEP-0277 (Libervia) and XEP-0472 (Movim)), and I would appreciate your advise. https://mail.jabber.org/hyperkitty/list/standards@xmpp.org/thread/QPHHLQKQJBHOE4ZW5IQFVLNXXABH26DW/ ✏

  3. Schimon

    *Lagrange* (Gemini and Gopher browser) I have asked to add four (4) distinguished icons to represent XMPP hyperlinks. Please vote and comment for this feature. https://github.com/skyjake/lagrange/issues/706

  4. pulkomandy

    I don't think asking people to vote and comment on features for projects they don't use is a great idea

  5. Schimon

    pulkomandy. Yes. Only if you use it.

  6. Schimon

    Though, I would argue that it would still be good, even if you do not use Lagrange nor Gemini, because doing so could further establish the awareness of XMPP.

  7. alexjoe

    Having some popular free speech politics rooms can boost Xmpp pop

  8. wgreenhouse

    alexjoe: make one

  9. Cynthia

    alexjoe: people tried that before you y'know ✎

  10. Cynthia

    alexjoe: people tried that before y'know ✏

  11. alexjoe

    And what did happen?

  12. Cynthia

    it ended up being a echo chamber, a cesspool of hatred and spammers

  13. Cynthia

    then the MUC shut down

  14. alexjoe

    Well spammers can be kicked out. Rest as far as legal allowed

  15. Cynthia

    then you got the borehole

  16. alexjoe

    That's how TG became so pop. Simple rules. Do what you want

  17. wgreenhouse

    alexjoe: are you asking permission? it's a free network, go make what you want

  18. wgreenhouse

    people will use it or not

  19. Cynthia

    ^

  20. alexjoe

    Discussing

  21. wgreenhouse

    what's to discuss

  22. Cynthia

    these "free speech" MUCs have one thing in common

  23. singpolyma

    Seems off topic for here

  24. Cynthia

    true

  25. alexjoe

    Promoting Xmpp is on topic

  26. Cynthia

    this is for XMPP development

  27. Cynthia

    and related to that ✎

  28. Cynthia

    and stuff related to that ✏

  29. kalkin

    alexjoe: you remember what happened yesterday? This will happen almost everywhere. I recommend setting up your own server for mucs with such content

  30. moparisthebest

    I recommend setting up your own server regardless :)

    👍 1
  31. Cynthia

    also disable MAM, the most popular "free speech" MUCs had it disabled due to problems with spammers posting illegal content

  32. Cynthia

    y'know, since you like free speech a lot :P

  33. alexjoe

    mam?

  34. Cynthia

    message archive management

  35. moparisthebest

    You don't *need* to disable mam, modern clients and servers allow moderators to... Well moderate/redact spam messages

  36. Cynthia

    moparisthebest: the clients that support redactions are rare

  37. Cynthia

    redacting within MAM is more effective

  38. Cynthia

    even if the message appears right now in the client, later when the client restarts (unless it restores from local logs) it won't

  39. moparisthebest

    Complain to your client dev (s) or send in a patch if they accept those

  40. moparisthebest

    > redacting within MAM is more effective Agree, and servers do that already ↺

  41. MaxSan

    Why is this called jdev I thought the jabber name was dropped like, a decade ago.

  42. alexjoe

    I was reading a bit. Cloudfare works with xmpp..

  43. singpolyma

    MaxSan: two reasons (a) historical (b) we mostly talk in here about dev for the network these days, so jabber still applies there