jdev - 2025-03-29

  1. agh

    Oh hello! left. Qxmpp does come with an updated OMEMO module, https://invent.kde.org/libraries/qxmpp/-/blob/master/src/omemo/README.md. I have no idea if that is aimed towards encrypting past the message data itself.

  2. blue

    Oh wow! I remember they didn't want to support anything but omemo 2 back in a day, which was sad, because apart from kaidan there were few clients supporting it. Did it get it right, that they are going to be able to support older versions of omemo?

  3. blue

    But if I'm not making a mistake all that omemo 2 initiative was about encrypting the whole message content, not just the body

  4. vril

    hi, I would like to update the Omemo page on the wiki ( https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Tech_pages/OMEMO ). Currently it is written that the most used versions of Omemo are 0.2.0 and 0.3.0, is this still true? Thanks

  5. wgreenhouse

    vril: most are on omemo 0.3 de facto as that is all that is supported by the Conversations clients

  6. wgreenhouse

    omemo 0.8 is aka twomemo

  7. vril

    thanks wgreenhouse, ! So, still true twomemo is an informal nickname right? Because I do not find that in Specifications.. ✎

  8. vril

    thanks wgreenhouse, ! So, still true twomemo is an informal nickname right? Because I do not find that in specifications.. ✏

  9. singpolyma

    Yes

    👍 1
  10. vril

    > Yes 👍 ↺

  11. blue

    Twomemo? Learn something new every day...

  12. wgreenhouse

    vril: yes, it's twomemo because these messages have the `urn:xmpp:omemo:2` namespace

  13. vril

    ahh 🤓️ thanks

  14. wgreenhouse

    yw :)

  15. vril

    Just upadated https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Tech_pages/OMEMO I was undecided whether to add this sentence as well (I did not include it because I am not sure if it is entirely true): "Also to note, while OMEMO (XEP-0384) is an experimental standard, its implementations for certain sets of messengers are standards as features." (copied from a forum)

  16. singpolyma

    Not sure what that means