jdev - 2025-04-30


  1. Amy

    Still no news bout jabber de?

  2. theTedd

    still: connection refused

  3. Guus

    Amy, if there is going to be new, then it's unlikely to be published here.

  4. Amy

    Guus, sorry i clicked the wrong room

  5. Guus

    No problem, just managing expectations

  6. lovetox

    is there any suggest when clients create client specific pubsub nodes, how the node name should be?

  7. lovetox

    say i want to store a custom blocking list

  8. lovetox

    urn:xmpp:blocking:gajim:1 ?

  9. Kev

    Only XSF-issued namespaces should start urn:xmpp

  10. Kev

    http://gajim.org/whatever would what I'd choose.

  11. lovetox

    ok, thats already a good hint :)

  12. lovetox

    so a URL? im not talking about a namespace

  13. Kev

    Sorry. s/namespace/uri/ :)

  14. lovetox

    http://gajim.org/protocol/blocking

  15. Kev

    That works.

  16. pulkomandy

    The tag: uri scheme is designed for this, but almost no one uses it

  17. edhelas

    > http://gajim.org/whatever would what I'd choose. Oops :3

  18. edhelas

    > Only XSF-issued namespaces should start urn:xmpp Oops :3

  19. stpeter

    https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4854.html 😛

  20. bodqhrohro

    > 2025-04-29T10:10:37Z - lovetox: > Just try it Seems like I'm doing something wrong.

  21. bodqhrohro

    https://im.ebala.net:5821/upload/o2SUqQ0KsGPe4f7_iPv4FuEd/2025-04-30-212442_1920x1200_scrot.png

  22. Goot the ticklegoblin!

    > The tag: uri scheme is designed for this, but almost no one uses it They should it's neat

  23. bodqhrohro

    > <singpolyma> > Yes, us too. List-single by itself gets special UI Nice indeed.

  24. bodqhrohro

    https://im.ebala.net:5821/upload/zHz4WsHmhMxhmK55BZOzUJLG/Screenshot_20250430-213110_another.im.jpg

  25. lovetox

    bodqhrohro, can you show the full form

  26. bodqhrohro

    > 2025-04-30T19:33:59Z - lovetox: > bodqhrohro, can you show the full form There are only closing tags lower.

  27. bodqhrohro

    Didn't you add this mode recently by any chance? I haven't pulled Gajim for months again, hehe.

  28. lovetox

    what is this in the screesnhot, a dropdown? or a list?

  29. edhelas

    > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4854.html 😛 Ah one question regarding Hats ! There is no way in the XEP to add a Hat to the "hats list" without actually assigning it to someone ?

  30. bodqhrohro

    > 2025-04-30T19:37:36Z - lovetox: > what is this in the screesnhot, a dropdown? or a list? `type="list-single"`, as you told.

  31. lovetox

    no i mean the gui you see

  32. lovetox

    with your system theme, i cannot even tell what widget im looking at

  33. bodqhrohro

    > 2025-04-30T19:40:04Z - lovetox: > with your system theme, i cannot even tell what widget im looking at Inspector tells it's GtkComboBox indeed.

  34. bodqhrohro

    It's empty until I roll it down.

  35. bodqhrohro

    Oh, maybe I should set the "required" attribute then.

  36. lovetox

    maybe switch first to a newer gajim version, this seems like a GTK3 version you are using

  37. bodqhrohro

    > 2025-04-30T19:42:30Z - lovetox: > maybe switch first to a newer gajim version, this seems like a GTK3 version you are using I still didn't port my reply fallback patch for it, hehe.

  38. lovetox

    what version does it show in about

  39. lovetox

    the latest 1.9.5 should have the code

  40. bodqhrohro

    > 2025-04-30T19:44:20Z - lovetox: > what version does it show in about 1.9.0+24dcb6426772 Too old then.

  41. lovetox

    then pull to 1.9.5 i dont think we did any big changes between those versions