-
sunglocto
Does anyone know if there is a MUC for MIX discussion/development?
-
singpolyma
This one i suppose
-
moparisthebest
what MIX discussion or development? (He's dead Jim)
😂 2 -
qy
might want the gc3 muc though
-
qy
xmpp:gc3@rooms.modernxmpp.org?join
-
singpolyma
> what MIX discussion or development? (He's dead Jim) Sure. But if there were to be any I'd expect it to be here ↺
-
moparisthebest
>> what MIX discussion or development? (He's dead Jim) > > Sure. But if there were to be any I'd expect it to be here :1000: ↺
-
lovetox
regarding the issue i posted yesterday about PMs, would this not mean every client should add their own occupant-id to outgoing MUC PMs, so the occupant-id is present when the clients own server carbon copies the message to other clients?
-
moparisthebest
server should be adding it no?
-
lovetox
how can it? its your own server that makes the copy not the MUC
-
lovetox
the message did not yet reach the MUC when the copy is made
-
lovetox
Or the other solution is to simply ignore occupant-id for outgoing messages, currently i store my own occupant-id beside each message i send, but i could also simply not do this and say, i dont need occupant-id for my own outgoing messages ..
-
lovetox
though the question is, do i really not need it ..
-
lovetox
yes i think one does not need occupant-id on MUC PM Outgoing, it should always be clear from the message to/from attribute that the message comes from one of our own clients, occupant-id is not necessary for identification
-
moparisthebest
I can't recall, are outgoing MUC PMs reflected to you as well?
-
lovetox
no
-
lovetox
its a type "chat" message like single chat
-
lovetox
its just routed via the MUC