jdev - 2026-02-03


  1. singpolyma

    > yes, but the normal way to use it has implied subscriptions Right. There's so implied subscription in MUC. I doubt explicit would work awesome either but it should work at all

  2. singpolyma

    The problem is that the traffic is insane if everyone actually wants everything. Would be nice if the MUC could multiplex it like it does for presence

  3. vpzom

    true, n^2 also sounds pretty bad

  4. vpzom

    MEP sounds like it _could_ be used here, but ideally clients would just publish once and have their server distribute it to MUCs, which would then send to all interested participants

  5. singpolyma

    Yes. The MUCs even know what participants are interested in already. They just have to sub and distribute. It's probably not hard to code it up

  6. hank

    what's all that fuss about

  7. hank

    send links for SFS and SIMS

  8. vpzom

    on an unrelated note: XEP-0461 shows "urn:xmpp:feature-fallback:0" as the namespace for the fallback element, is that actually correct or should it be "urn:xmpp:fallback:0" per XEP-0428?

  9. singpolyma

    That's what it used to be iirc

  10. lovetox

    The example of 461 is wrong

  11. sunglocto

    I'm aware that there is an extension that can be used to share the user's currently playing song (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0118.html) but is there any extension for showing, for example, a currently running game on the user's device?

  12. theTedd

    XEP-0196: User Gaming

  13. sunglocto

    Thank you