jdev - 2026-02-04

What spec are Movim/Monocles following for comments?

What are other people doing about this problem: <presence from muc/NICK><x xmlns=vcard-temp:x:update><photo>HASH</photo></x></presence> <iq GET VCARD TEMP /> <iq type="result"><vCard xmlns="vcard-temp"><PHOTO><TYPE>image/jpeg</TYPE></PHOTO></vCard></iq> so since I didn't get a photo, next time I get their presence they still claim they have one, and give me the hash for it, but I still don't have anything matching that hash so I fetch again... and again... and again...

I really wish whatever server is doing this would stop, but in lieu of that...

cache the negative response for some time?

or maybe forever...

forever would be a problem I think. but maybe "until next app start" or something yeah

in theory next upload to fix it should upload correctly *then* set the new hash

but yea... relying on clearly broken thing to do the right thing feels sketchy lol

I don't think the hash is wrong. I'm currently chasing it down but I think it's permissions related

yup, confirmed.

if avatar in prosody is set to "contacts only" then prosody always injects the hash to presence, but strips only the binary from the vcard-temp

if I fetch the same vcard-temp from a contact or a non-contact (including of course via a muc) it acts differently

which seems correct on the fetch side. but then I get this hash...

could that be wrong behavior on the prosody side?

IMHO yes it is

if I wouldn't allow the target jid to see the photo, then I shouldn't tell it about the photo hash in presence

IMHO

but maybe that's hard I dunno