Hello,
Ideally I would like a little help with XEP-0450.7.2.18-T9 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#table-9> , and the "cosmetic" "triviality" presented, thereafter.
This, so I might be more effectively be able to deal with those ≤80_-_XEP-0148.4.1 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0148.html#impl-levels> end-users = XEP-0148.2 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0148.html#concepts>
Such as when I have XEP-0045.15.7.2 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#registrar-querytypes-invite> 'd them; whereas a fellow tech' testing, has experienced 406 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes#406>.
This, where I have preconditioned, via XEP-0045.10.2 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#roomconfig> , XEP-0045.7.2.5 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#enter-semianon> , optionally XEP-0045.7.2.6 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#enter-pw> (providing, of course, the variable), and XEP-0045.7.2.7 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#enter-members> .
Thus, they must: XEP-0450.7.10 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#register> , & XEP-0450.7.13 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#requestvoice> , & I would subsequently XEP-0450.8.3 <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#grantvoice> them.
I have been already been given the "helpful", "Google is your friend." (withOUT LMGTFY), and "If it's not verbatim, in a(n) RFC/JEP/XEP it does not, or should not exist".
Ergo, I have been disabused of the old, sagely wisdom "Experience is the best teacher.", so, instead of asking, to learn from one with experience, since, "The XEP is the best teacher", I ask the XEP what it would do, in real-world, applied situations. WWXEPD?
I find no local unix-like RFC-862 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc862> , but, that's what these MUC's seem most useful as, with some RFC-862 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc862> 'ers.