XMPP Service Operators - 2021-04-15

Hello! I would like my server exmpp.ru to be listed on xmpp.net. I found instructions on how to do it there. But I could not find the link itself, where to apply.

Misha: listed as?

Licaon_Kter: what???

Misha, did you paste it in there and click the button

Licaon_Kter: I don't understand what you mean yet

moparisthebest: what

Misha, sorry, what's your question ?

sorry, I am here for the first time

Misha: do tell more about it, terms, policies, etc

Do you speak Russian?

Misha: no, can you read english? https://xmpp.net/register.php :)

Yes yes

Licaon_Kter: I need to tell you now what is required there?

Don't bother with xmpp.net

MattJ: why?

Because the site is old and barely maintained. It will likely be replaced at some point.

MattJ: but Miranda NG takes the list from there

I'll keep that in mind :)

I want to make my server popular

I've heard that before :)

Important to users is that servers are reliable, trustworthy, and not going to disappear when the admin gets bored

Not that they are popular

Misha: is your server tested here? https://compliance.conversations.im/

Wiktor: not yet

Misha: > I want to make my server popular Wait...why?

MattJ: I will take this matter seriously

Wiktor: I want to add any XEP, then I will test my server

Misha: 👍

Any xep or every xep?

😊

rob: any, but I will strive for what you add each

Misha: that really depends on the functionality you want to support

But as mentioned the conversations compliance suite is a good place to start

MattJ: > I'll keep that in mind :) Why? Are you working on a replacement? Jonas already has done some work on xmpp.net v2 based on testssl.sh ✏

https://exmpp.ru:5443/upload/856f9319042579c7e29b21ed8adc9ac69582fb42/if38xQbt98roTSbLkM0gNyhP3XNulGggfwtadfkg/CfU6s03KRe-NUGHxXpvTKg.jpg

Misha: 👍

Доступен = available

Misha: what server software? Openfire or Tigase? :)

Ejabberd, CentOS 7

Easy to setup?

for a start - yes, but further configuration will be more difficult. Everything works out of the box.

Very nice Misha, I run prosody and it's more work to get to that point, not too hard but more for sure

Martin, I'm not working on a replacement, but as the person primarily responsible for XSF infrastructure it will be something to take into consideration when we retire this service (that clients are using the data there)

by the way, inband registration works on my server

Wiktor: 90% compliance test exmpp.ru

Misha: what's missing?

TURN (but STUN works), SRV, abuse contact and other connect method HTTP (but TCP socket works)

Easy then :)

I dont want TURN because STUN is works

:)

Licaon_Kter: can we test voice calls?

We? Nope :)

> I dont want TURN because STUN is works > :) So one client on Wi-Fi and one on mobile data and STUN is enough?

> We? Nope :) Ok

> So one client on Wi-Fi and one on mobile data and STUN is enough? I think, yes

Because mobile operator Tele2 supported Full Cone NAT default

And many WIFI networks supported full cone nat

> Because mobile operator Tele2 supported Full Cone NAT default Supports* ✏

But mobile operator Beeline supports only symmetric NAT.

Not my experience. Some lucky ones, maybe. Hope all your users are using those :)

What's the difference?

Nat is nat

Full cone? Symmetric?

I guess you could differentiate DNAT and SNAT

tom: wikipedia