XMPP Service Operators - 2021-05-24


  1. qy

    Just fediverse things

  2. thndrbvr

    Anyone familiar with PSI+? Is it possible to hide all the join & removed messages?

  3. tom

    » <thndrbvr> Anyone familiar with PSI+? Is it possible to hide all the join & removed messages? it is, i forgot how though

  4. tom

    let me know if you figure it out again

  5. thndrbvr

    These are NOT it: Options -> Advanced -> Filter: join -> options.ui.muc.show-initial-joins=false; ...hide-on-autojoin=true; ..show-joins=false Unless something's bugged.

  6. thndrbvr

    Options -> Messages -> Groupchat -> unchecked: show status with priority and show initial joins. Didn't change anything either. Hm.

  7. thndrbvr

    Also, this seems to be the only Qt XMPP I can find that's mature enough to use that's still being developed. Correct me if I'm wrong.

  8. moparisthebest

    Mature *and* still being developed? You drive a hard bargain

  9. moparisthebest

    https://www.kaidan.im/ meets one of those

  10. qrpnxz

    kaidan is hello immature :) Too much missing for me to use it. It's going for a Dino-like, roster less UI which is sad.

  11. thndrbvr

    I concur. Just tried it again. I couldn't figure out how to view any MUCs. Lol. Which is the only thing I use this account for. Gajim I do believe has an option to mush all the windows into one. I don't particularly like that UI/UX idea on desktop. Maybe with a tiling WM?

  12. thndrbvr

    That being said.. Once Dino gains all the features, I'm sure it'll be great on the Librem 5. :D

  13. qrpnxz

    kaidan is hella immature :) Too much missing for me to use it. It's going for a Dino-like roster-less UI which is sad.

  14. Licaon_Kter

    thndrbvr: no MUC support, only MIX No omemo (what all the other clients use now) but they got funds for omemo:1 (no other client supports that now)

  15. Licaon_Kter

    thndrbvr: kaidan, no MUC support, only MIX No omemo (what all the other clients use now) but they got funds for omemo:1 (no other client supports that now)

  16. tom

    Oh that's good

  17. tom

    Progress

  18. tom

    Their guy looks like he's going to eat my soul though https://www.kaidan.im/images/features/audio-message.svg

  19. tom

    He's already munching on one

  20. şişio

    Test

  21. moparisthebest

    worked

  22. şişio

    Now

  23. şişio

    Good

  24. şişio

    İn the xsf room all of man xmpp logo

  25. şişio

    https://upload.blabber.im/5a63587d491fb82e/540324a318228843.jpg

  26. rob

    moparisthebest: do you think my issue with sendxmpp-rs is related to only using tlsv1.2+?

  27. rob

    I was going to comment on the issue but prefer near real time when I can get it

  28. moparisthebest

    hrm do you have the openssl or the rustls version

  29. rob

    One sec, I'll look

  30. moparisthebest

    rustls only supports TLS 1.2+, openssl, who knows

  31. rob

    OpenSSL is 1.1.1

  32. moparisthebest

    easiest thing would be to compile the latest master, or use a static build from https://github.com/moparisthebest/sendxmpp-rs/releases , I just tested sendxmpp-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl from there and it works with my tls 1.2+ prosody

  33. rob

    Rustls looks like 0.19.1.. ok I'll try that

  34. rob

    Same issue

  35. rob

    Maybe it's my server?

  36. rob

    Which is https://xmpp.net/result.php?domain=loranger.xyz&type=client

  37. rob

    Unless it's the machine in trying to run it on, I'll try my laptop in a minute

  38. moparisthebest

    ah rob one major difference I notice between that and my/most servers is your ECDSA key, vs RSA key

  39. rob

    Oh, I don't even know what that is. Maybe something in the way traefik provisions from le?

  40. rob

    Works fine in my laptop, so something weird about the server

  41. rob

    OpenSSL on the server is 1.1.1f and laptop is 1.1.1k so maybe I'll see about upgrading that

  42. rob

    It seems complicated, maybe I'll put it in a container lol

  43. moparisthebest

    it almost sounds like a routing issue from your server

  44. moparisthebest

    especially if the static binary that doesn't use openssl didn't work on it

  45. rob

    Could be, it's a bit of a mess. Using wireguard to bring traffic into the server, and it's Ubuntu

  46. mjk

    şişio: looks like a client (Blabber) GUI bug, but could also be your server's issue, I guess

  47. şişio

    > mjk wrote: > şişio: looks like a client (Blabber) GUI bug, but could also be your server's issue, I guess Resolved

  48. mjk nods

  49. xorman

    > ah rob one major difference I notice between that and my/most servers is your ECDSA key, vs RSA key what? you don't use ecdsa but rsa?

  50. moparisthebest

    Most of the web still uses RSA