XMPP Service Operators - 2021-10-23

Will say only this: I haven't ever seen christian say anything like this before, but it certainly does not bode well for him.

Hi all. Does anyone know any xmpp domains that has a v3 .onion address with webclient (which also have a muc/conference) where people can either join it anonymously without account or with an account?

?

i have a birman cat that is 12 years old, it is black, and its name is nigga. where is fas problem?

https://xmpp.zp1.net:5281/upload/J6DhGS5rZCFf2aN_/0WGMx9ERR16ZjQhXkl0FjA.jpg

it was on a chat about cats.

what is this block captain atitude?

this guy is calling me "christian, you piece of shit"

https://xmpp.zp1.net:5281/upload/UwJR_8Gs_aZkGnrl/12P4Li90SlCUTiO0W0_1Vg.png

i think calling someone "christian you piece of shit" is a terrible insult, and can't be justified by the fact that i named my black cat nigga 12 years ago. nigga is not peiorative, it's meant to be chummy. But "christian du stück scheisse" is an insult according to 185 bgb. i could have called her blacky, back then, 12 years ago, but it seemed more like a dog name than a cat name.

>185 bgb

citing the law? do it properly

Ellenor Bjornsd.: That would be § 185 StGB (criminal law), not BGB (civil law).

millesimus: Of Germany?

What does any of this have to do with running an XMPP service?

Seemingly nothing moparisthebest

zp1.net: Independent from the name of your cat, in that screenshot grrras posted you are clearly not referring to the cat but using an insulting and offensive word and I suspect you are very aware of this.

Ellenor Bjornsd.: yep

for those w/o a § key, i'd suggest using the word 'sect.', short for 'section.' a proper cite would've been "§ 185 stgb (Germany)" as this is an international chatroom. I am in Canada, so I don't have to know the German code all that well.

Ellenor Bjornsd.: i don't care, i do not Intention to sue anybody :)))

then ... why'd you cite the code?

Could all of it discussed somewhere else please?

afaik it's finished. ✏

> zp1.net: Independent from the name of your cat, in that screenshot grrras posted you are clearly not referring to the cat but using an insulting and offensive word and I suspect you are very aware of this. And for the reference, and then I'll shut up about it, I asked Christian if he believes if it's ok if I name a bird "Christian you piece if shit". I said, I disagree that this would be ok. Christan said he's fine with that, hence I did for what Christian gave consent.

grrras stop it, that's enough of a petty fight and none of it belongs to here as well.

rare enough, I agree with Maranda

Maranda, jonas’: 1. I said I stop taking about it, your reply just makes noise 2. I will now respond to your reply in general. 3. Is there nothing like a ToS that is used? Everyone can be a service operator and will be welcomed by the community for ever, doesn't matter what they do? Is there a line? Will it be ever drawn? 4. I read the channel guidlines https://xmpp.org/community/channels/operators/ There it says, that the issue I brought up is on-topic. I'll quote the relevant parts: "...also a place for the wider XMPP community (including end-users and operators of non-federated servers) to get in touch with operators to resolve issues, report abuse or any other service related topic." "Announcements and raising awareness about problematic actors in the ecosystem affecting end-users or services negatively, preferably with corresponding evidence so that everyone is able to form their own opinion." This and only this is what I did. If you believe this is OT, you are either in the wrong room, or you may request the guidlines to be changed. For the reason people expressed their discomfort to continue the debate about an user, I agreed to stop the debate about the user, hence the shift in topic.

grrras, did I say anything about not enforcing? I just woke up, but there's no point to discuss this in public. It just creates noise as yousaid.

I'm in fact already looking into this, so let's keep it out of the public channel until a resolution has been found. I'll get in touch with both of you privately.

Ok

grrras: > ToS ToS is fine for making intentions explicit, but in cases such as this one, it typically wouldn't avoid endless discussions on the question whether the line was crossed. My solution is to join communities where I trust the intentions of the moderators to be fine (like this one) and leave the decision on whether lines were crossed to them, assuming good faith.

Anyone know? 🙂 ✏

Reason for asking,is because I have had no luck finding any yet

sorry, what are you asking? I didn't see your question.

> Hi all. Does anyone know any xmpp domains that has a v3 .onion address with webclient (which also have a muc/conference) where people can either join it anonymously without account or with an account?

thanks

no don't know of any

Would be an interesting feature for one of the services that has onion anyways. But I suppose it would be like another 8chan.. So... ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯

have a nice day

so you mean a .webclient doesnt really have any v3 .onion address?

Jaxx: it depends on what the admin sets up, yes it's possible technically

I see.. thanks. i do have few xmpp domains,but dont know if any of them have any webclient.. Is there any way to check that?

Jaxx: see their websites...?!

thanks 😃