XMPP Service Operators - 2023-07-06

  1. sagaracharya

    That is not offtopic at all. There are some things that server hosts know best

  2. moparisthebest

    this isn't a chat for server hosts, it's a chat for XMPP Operators about the XMPP network as the topic says

  3. Trung

    sagaracharya, do join us in the pit: xmpp:conversations-offtopic-reloaded@conference.trashserver.net?join

  4. Menel

    There are also privacy and security rooms

  5. radovan

    everyoneisapedophile@conversations.im for rtbl please

  6. Licaon_Kter

    radovan: context?

  7. radovan

    they were spamming that youtube link with slurs in my room

  8. Licaon_Kter


  9. radovan


  10. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    also spamming the programming room

  11. radovan

    an inverted rtbl would be nice

  12. radovan

    ie. operators could send in hashed jids of known good/longterm users, so there would be less chaff from rooms that don't give default voice

  13. radovan

    privacy concerns probably too high though

  14. msavoritias

    what you are describing could work as a capability based architecture coupled with the xep that was submitted yesterday at the xsf room. but offtopic for here

  15. Licaon_Kter

    Moderated rooms are a toggle away radovan

  16. MattJ

    Also the RTBL (at least in the Prosody and riddim implementations) does not override member affiliation - it's good practice to ensure trusted regulars in your channel are marked as members

  17. MattJ

    That also allows them to continue communicating if you need to toggle the room to moderated

  18. ☭Mike Yellow

    Are the functions of Monal and Siskin not as good as Conversations?

  19. ☭Mike Yellow

    Are the functions of Monal and Siskin not as good as Conversations in MUC?

  20. ☭Mike Yellow

    Oh sorry! I asked in wrong room!

  21. Licaon_Kter

    ☭Mike Yellow: yes, they are not :)

  22. ☭Mike Yellow

    Thank you.

  23. Maranda eyes -> singpolyma ha abbandonato la stanza: Banned by RTBL for spam

  24. Maranda

    🧐 false positive?

  25. Licaon_Kter

    Which xmpp address?

  26. Maranda

    That I'm not sure I seen that in conversations offtopic

  27. Licaon_Kter


  28. MattJ

    What was the timestamp?

  29. ibrahin

    If it was a few data go that was impostor

  30. ibrahin

    Days ago*

  31. Maranda

    MattJ: 13:43 CET

  32. MattJ


  33. Maranda

    Of course

  34. sagaracharya

    I suggest for inactive groups, we need artificial traffic

  35. sagaracharya

    So people join in even if there are few people

  36. ibrahin

    how about no

  37. sagaracharya

    We need to show people that there are 100 people when there are 10 Then once, things kick off. More people will be on xmpp and groups

  38. ibrahin

    why would you be a liar?

  39. Licaon_Kter

    sagaracharya: we don't want to lie like matrix, c'mon

  40. Licaon_Kter

    Also, offtopic... need that MUC link again?

  41. sagaracharya

    Licaon_Kter: It's a harmless lie to encourage people to gather. I'm certainly not asking to add a ChatGPT enabled bot there

  42. Link Mauve

    All of the top MUCs at s.j.n are Matrix lying about users who aren’t present. ^^

  43. Licaon_Kter


  44. sagaracharya

    Just like irc where 90% users don't respond

  45. Licaon_Kter

    sagaracharya: we have that too lol in Offtopic, but not because of...

  46. sagaracharya

    Critical mass is a grave issue. I formed a group on lemmy.ml for that

  47. sagaracharya


  48. ibrahin

    Link Mauve, fwiw my room shows as 300 on s.j.n, but 1200 on view.matrix.org so it could be said the former is more accurate

  49. Licaon_Kter

    I've kicked all the bridged users, and at least 2 archiving bots, except Maranda from Offtopic

  50. Licaon_Kter

    I've kicked all the bridged users, and at least 2 archiving bots, except Maranda, from Offtopic

  51. ibrahin

    sagaracharya, please don't pm me

  52. sagaracharya

    What are you saying?