XMPP Service Operators - 2023-08-22

  1. mirux

    Establishing a secure connection to linuxoid.in failed. Certificate hash: 070758f177af285f9cc97f6bd895f56c3b4599a7. This certificate is invalid for linuxoid.in.

  2. mirux

    Is the admin around?

  3. Menel

    I've the same... And I doubt anyone of my users was reaching for that. Is it possible to get these errors when they scan us? I guess with an xmpp ping it would be like that too?

  4. Licaon_Kter

    I see them "scan" my pubsub node since lant year ✎

  5. Licaon_Kter

    I see them "scan" my pubsub node since last year ✏

  6. mirux

    > I see them "scan" my pubsub node since lant year > > I see them "scan" my pubsub node since last year How to action on this? Ignoring blocking ? ✎

  7. mirux

    > I see them "scan" my pubsub node since lant year > > I see them "scan" my pubsub node since last year How to action on this? Ignoring? blocking ? ✏

  8. Licaon_Kter

    They get rejected my default, since the cert is not goodl ✎

  9. Licaon_Kter

    They get rejected my default, since the cert is not good ✏

  10. mirux

    Oki

  11. mirux

    What if cert would be good? We wont be even aware of the scanning?

  12. Licaon_Kter

    I guess, then again, since it's cyclical, I guess something was inputed wrong, like they're trying s2s to pubsub.domain.tld

  13. mirux

    I guess there is no kind of fail2ban for these kind of activities on server side?

  14. j.r (jugendhacker.de)

    mirux: you could write a fail2ban filter for it....

  15. Menel

    Since it is only one attempt... You want to ban it? For how long? Also false positives...