-
jonas’
banned for ad-hominem, bad-faith discussion✎ -
jonas’
worlio.com has been banned for ad-hominem, bad-faith discussion ✏
-
jonas’
worlio.com has been banned for ad-hominem attacks and bad-faith discussion ✏
-
f_
Hello fellow XMPP operators!
-
jonas’
o/
-
f_
jonas’: Hi! \o it looks like yesterday a new XMPP server was born :)
-
f_
runxiyu[x]: hey hi!
-
f_
You can't talk in here just yet - you need to configure some stuff in your xmpp server before authbot lets you talk
-
f_
One sec...
-
f_
You need this https://compliance.conversations.im/test/abuse-contact/
-
jonas’
https://www.openssh.com/releasenotes.html
-
jonas’
> A critical vulnerability in sshd(8) was present in Portable OpenSSH > versions between 8.5p1 and 9.7p1 (inclusive) that may allow arbitrary > code execution with root privileges.
-
f_
runxiyu[x]: see https://prosody.im/doc/modules/mod_server_contact_info once you get it working authbot will change your affiliation to "member" and you'll be able to talk
-
f_
jonas’: Ouch.
-
runxiyu[x]
Thanks!
-
f_
runxiyu[x]: There you are :) welcome!
-
jonas’
o/
-
f_
jonas’: That's the new server I was talking about =)
-
f_
runxiyu[x]: be sure to read the channel guidelines BTW
-
runxiyu[x]
I don't see it in the topic ...
-
jonas’
https://xmpp.org/community/channels/operators
-
runxiyu[x]
I'm really new to XMPP in general so I'd appreciate any help there
-
runxiyu[x]
Ah thanks
-
f_
Consider joining the other channels listed - https://xmpp.org/community/chat/
-
f_
There's a semi-official (I guess?) #XMPP channel over on libera, too.
-
f_
And finally, joinjabber.org hosts some support channels you may find very useful.
-
runxiyu[x]
For the most part I prefer IRC for group chats and (start to) prefer XMPP for private chats
-
f_
Have fun!
-
Mr. Barks-a-lot
> worlio.com has been banned for ad-hominem attacks and bad-faith discussion Yeah no I'm leaving. Apparently equal enforcement and having a mature argument are both concepts foreign to this chat. ↺
-
ukko
https://www.qualys.com/2024/07/01/cve-2024-6387/regresshion.txt
-
ukko
https://lwn.net/ml/all/d2ed9e542682bf82@cvs.openbsd.org/
-
Brian
> For the most part I prefer IRC for group chats and (start to) prefer XMPP for private chats Started with IRC, myself, in the 90s. In any case, welcome! ↺
-
Polarian
Hello... I have a question about XSF's view on XMPP providers which use their position to fund violence and rioting... would this violate their terms?✎ -
Polarian
Hello... I have a question about XSF's view on XMPP providers which use their position to fund violence and rioting... would this violate XSF terms? ✏
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
1. this is for xsf not providers 2. this is without context and phrased in a way to delibaretily incite anger and flamewars. so this is not in good faith in general✎ -
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
1. this is for xsf not operators room 2. this is without context and phrased in a way to delibaretily incite anger and flamewars. so this is not in good faith in general ✏
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
this is not how we should approach discussions
-
Polarian
> 1. this is for xsf not operators room > 2. this is without context and phrased in a way to delibaretily incite anger and flamewars. so this is not in good faith in general XSF guidelines cover this room... ↺
-
Polarian
This might be the operators, but the guidelines still cover it
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
sure. but its still offtopic
-
Polarian
or thats what I understood from what jonas said a while back
-
Polarian
> sure. but its still offtopic It is not... and I would not like to elaborate otherwise it COULD cause offense ↺
-
Guus
The XSF's policies (in particular the code of conduct) applies to anyone who: - Acts in a capacity which could reasonably be expected to be acting on behalf of the XMPP Standards Foundation or the wider XMPP Community. - Participates in any XSF Activity. Running XMPP server software in itself does not qualify.
-
Polarian
> The XSF's policies (in particular the code of conduct) applies to anyone who: > - Acts in a capacity which could reasonably be expected to be acting on behalf of the XMPP Standards Foundation or the wider XMPP Community. > - Participates in any XSF Activity. > Running XMPP server software in itself does not qualify. Being in this channel does count though, does it not? ↺
-
Guus
These are the guidelines that apply to this channel: https://xmpp.org/community/channels/operators/
-
Polarian
hm thanks
-
Guus
There is this note in that text: > The CoC only applies to XMPP Standards Foundation (XSF) members and venues. It does not automatically apply to all members of all XMPP channels. [...]
-
nuegia.net
Polarian, this is offtopic
-
roughnecks
is this ok? ``` ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 65494 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;magicbroccoli.de. IN AAAA ``` their own "xmpp-chatbot" which I'm running fails on querying it
-
roughnecks
`roughnecks: Server-to-server connection failed: ServFail in AAAA lookup. !uptime magicbroccoli.de resulted in: remote-server-not-found`
-
roughnecks
I mean, is it a misconfiguration or really no IPv6 and the bot doesn't try for v4?