-
kapad
i also think tech people that have the power or the connections to `push` things, should also considered a common **legal fact** that if an algorithm is close source aka unknown cant be accepted into legal processes
-
kapad
that could help to be these `tools` public available and tested, also might do things a little more fair
-
kapad
while people (fairly) have lost their trust in justice, the truth is there are still laws `sitting` somewhere waiting for someone to trigger/activate them. In current reality, people cant know about them, but even worst as time pass people will stop to think as logical a `certain` law should exist so to search for it._
-
kapad
Read 5th's grade history deal with Roman empire, it is said as about my country, that romans realize to occupy us must keep people separate ( divide and conquer ). So to do that, they reached that the way was to destroy `democracy` and `justice` ! Being alive `here` also watch the global news, seems some thousands years after, not much changed and this is still the best way.
- kapad EOF 👈
-
moparisthebest
> i also think tech people that have the power or the connections to `push` things, should also considered a common **legal fact** that if an algorithm is close source aka unknown cant be accepted into legal processes kapad: see all the digital over-the-air TV standards (ATSC, DVB-T), entirely full of obscure codecs no one has heard of instead of open alternatives because, wait for it: 1. The companies who owned the patents and could therefore extract royalties from every implementer pushed them through the legal process. 💀 ↺