Summits, Conferences and Meetups workgroup - 2018-11-26

  1. jc has left
  2. daniel has left
  3. daniel has joined
  4. daniel has left
  5. daniel has joined
  6. daniel has left
  7. daniel has joined
  8. daniel has left
  9. daniel has joined
  10. daniel has left
  11. daniel has joined
  12. has joined
  13. daniel has left
  14. daniel has joined
  15. jc has joined
  16. daniel has left
  17. daniel has joined
  18. jc has left
  19. jc has joined
  20. Guus Ralph, do we have a policy for accepting people to the RTC lounge? We had several requests.
  21. Guus (I'd personally love for the Jitsi guys to be there - most of their core team is moving back to Europe - would be nice to have them)
  22. Guus I'm unsure if the Tor project really qualifies as an RTC project though?
  23. Link Mauve has left
  24. Link Mauve has joined
  25. daniel has left
  26. daniel has left
  27. daniel has left
  28. daniel has left
  29. has left
  30. has joined
  31. Guus has left
  32. Guus has left
  33. daniel has left
  34. daniel has left
  35. ralphm has left
  36. Guus ralphm ^^
  37. ralphm Jitsi totally, I don't see Tor as RTC either
  38. has left
  39. Guus who makes this call? us?
  40. ralphm Yes, it is our stand
  41. Guus ok. Want me to reply to both?
  42. ralphm Yep
  43. Guus wilco
  44. ralphm I'm guessing that Matrix' stand will be next to us
  45. ralphm But the floor plan isn't available yet
  46. Guus ralphm: "Although I'd love to be able to accommodate you, space at the RTC lounge stand is limited. I appreciate your argument that Tor can be used as infrastructure for real-time communication, but using that definition, many projects would qualify. I'm sorry to disappoint you, but we'd prefer to reserve the space for projects that are RTC-by-nature. I hope you'll find some space elsewhere!"
  47. Guus comme c-with-dangling-thing-a?
  48. ralphm Comme ça!
  49. ralphm And you can tell Jitsi they don't ever need an invite to party with us.
  50. Guus I'm not sure who's seeing these mailinglist messages - best not to be overly friendly to one, when I just rejected another 🙂
  51. Guus but I share the sentiment.
  52. Guus ralphm: was that you, that sent that reply on my email to Iain? The author is unnamed.
  53. ralphm I have not sent mails
  54. Guus fosdem-rtc-admin <>
  55. ralphm Likely Daniel Pocock
  56. Guus He appears to disagree with our dismissal - or at least, with me doing the dismissal before contacting him.
  57. Guus has left
  58. daniel has left
  59. ralphm That's fine. You and I are responsible for this stand.
  60. ralphm has left
  61. ralphm has left
  62. jc has left
  63. jc has joined
  64. daniel has left
  65. Guus has left
  66. daniel has left
  67. daniel has left
  68. daniel has left
  69. daniel has left
  70. daniel has left