-
emus
> In general I think I would rather move to a model where we just have recurring sponsors for the XSF, instead of people sponsoring individual events 👍 ↺
-
emus
> I don't expect this to change but just for the record, I think the right move would be to move away from Brussels rather than making the hurdle even higher for attendees. Brussels is already amongst the most expensive cities you can find in Europe, plus FOSDEM and other events make accomodation even harder to find and more expensive around Summit. Adding another fee on top (250 Euros?) is a direction I really don't agree with. The Cisco buildings are no longer a reason to do Summit in Brussels, and my impression in the past years was that most attendees did not feel strongly about FOSDEM either. If the only reason Summit is in Brussels is tradition, I think that tradition should be challenged rather than adding an attendance fee just to deal with Brussels pricing. 👍 ↺
-
emus
> Can we get board to approve this outside their regular meeting? Can you write a message to board with the proposal? But yes, that should be possible. ↺
-
emus
Daniel, just did it