XMPP Summit - 2019-01-23

  1. oli has left

  2. oli has joined

  3. oli has left

  4. oli has joined

  5. jjrh has left

  6. oli has left

  7. oli has joined

  8. Guus has left

  9. Guus has left

  10. Zash has left

  11. Guus has left

  12. Guus has left

  13. Thanos has left

  14. Guus has left

  15. pep. has left

  16. Guus has left

  17. oli has joined

  18. Guus has left

  19. Guus has left

  20. Guus has left

  21. Guus has left

  22. Guus has left

  23. Guus has left

  24. Tobias has joined

  25. Tobias has left

  26. Tobias has joined

  27. Guus has left

  28. Guus has left

  29. ralphm has left

  30. sezuan has left

  31. oli has joined

  32. goffi has joined

  33. alameyo has left

  34. debacle has joined

  35. Seve/SouL has joined

  36. oli has joined

  37. Holger has left

  38. ralphm has left

  39. debacle has left

  40. ralphm

    Please select your menu for the XSF Dinner here: https://goo.gl/forms/hEtClRjLu7QqFkwS2

  41. ralphm

    No selection => no food for you.

  42. Remko has joined

  43. alameyo has joined

  44. ralphm has left

  45. debacle has joined

  46. Zash has left

  47. jjrh has left

  48. Holger has left

  49. Guus has left

  50. oli has left

  51. Guus has left

  52. Guus has left

  53. Guus has left

  54. Guus has left

  55. Guus has left

  56. Zash has joined

  57. Zash has left

  58. Zash has joined

  59. Guus has left

  60. jjrh has left

  61. Guus has left

  62. Zash


  63. jjrh has left

  64. jjrh has left

  65. jjrh has left

  66. jjrh has left

  67. Tobias has left

  68. ralphm has left

  69. oli has left

  70. debacle

    Slightly OT: Does somebody have a list of XMPP related talks at FOSDEM? I found: Sunday 09:25 Goffi: XMPP Beyond Instant Messaging

  71. debacle

    Sunday 14:00 JS: Converse Sunday 16:05 pep.: Make XMPP sprint again

  72. debacle

    Sunday 14:00 JC: Converse Sunday 16:05 pep.: Make XMPP sprint again

  73. pep.


  74. Link Mauve

    Another from goffi in the afternoon.

  75. pep.

    There's even a wiki page :)

  76. Seve/SouL


  77. debacle

    too bad, goffis second talk conflicts with pep.s

  78. pep.

    It's fine you don't have to come to mine :-°

  79. Guus


  80. Guus

    To lazy to type on mobile

  81. ralphm

    Very high tech

  82. Guus

    My dad taught me

  83. Guus

    To counter, I'm currently looking like this:

  84. Guus


  85. oli has joined

  86. ralphm


  87. Zash


  88. Zash

    The cyborgs are among us!

  89. debacle

    There is also a talk about OTR4

  90. Link Mauve


  91. jjrh has left

  92. goffi

    debacle: yes I know, and first one is really early when everybody will be partying the night before :-/

  93. debacle

    goffi, very good: people will party til 9, then they go to your talk and then they will sleep

  94. debacle

    and dream of SàT

  95. goffi

    ah ah

  96. debacle

    There are also some M.A.T.R.I.X. related talks: Saturday 14:00 Matrix in the French State Saturday 16:15 Displaying other Application data into a Wiki Sunday 10:40 Breaking the 100 bits per second barrier with Matrix

  97. Link Mauve

    100 bits per second? :|

  98. Alex has joined

  99. debacle

    Probably some kind of joke.

  100. oli

    100 bits per second, try that with XMPP ...

  101. debacle

    OT, again: Can somebody please make an XMPP enabled version of ConfClerk? It's nice that I mark the talks I like to see, but it would be much nicer, if I could share my selection with my colleagues, so that we can coordinate ourselves.

  102. oli

    debacle‎: not a joke

  103. oli

    "Matrix has always theoretically supported alternative transports, and we finally got an excuse to build one and push it to a ludicrous extreme - to try to operate usably over links as low as 100bps, as high as 4s latency, and up to 40% jitter"

  104. debacle

    oli, with XMPP it's: <bit role="mostsignificantbit">1</bit> etc.

  105. Zash


  106. Link Mauve

    debacle, ITYM https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0239.html

  107. oli

    "Meet COI (Chat over IMAP) - a powerful contender for WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger and other proprietary messengers."

  108. Alex has left

  109. oli

    > “What about XMPP and Matrix.org?” – glad you asked! We love XMPP and Matrix.org because they provide a great solution – this only solves the problem in theory though. With XMPP and Matrix.org-based services you would still need to convince everyone to join your new network. Easy in theory, very complex in practice!

  110. Zash

    Chat over email also sounds nice in theory. But in practice... good luck.

  111. oli has left

  112. Link Mauve

    There was already DeltaChat which attempted something similar.

  113. Link Mauve

    A comrade of mine is a proponent of it, but I haven’t heard any sound argument so far.

  114. oli

    Zash: it's chat over imap, might be without the smtp stuff

  115. oli

    i don't know

  116. oli

    if this involves full blown email shit, good look in convincing people to install their own servers.

  117. Zash

    oli: then you're in extension hell. enjoy.

  118. oli

    email is hell

  119. Zash

    can you submit email over imap yet?

  120. oli

    Zash: yes and no, no standard for this

  121. oli

    but workarounds that work

  122. Zash

    Wasn't there an extension?

  123. oli


  124. Zash

    And then there's the crowd trying to kill IMAP and replace it with JSON and HTTP

  125. oli


  126. Zash


  127. oli

    it's quite cool

  128. Zash


  129. oli

    anyway, the speaker's company is developing the dovecot imap server.

  130. oli

    Zash: JMAP has a better design than IMAP in my oppinion

  131. oli

    We should ask the fastmail guys how to do chat over it 😂

  132. pep.

    "debacle> There is also a talk about OTR4", probably similar to the one at CCC?

  133. ralphm has left

  134. Holger has left

  135. Holger has left

  136. oli has left

  137. debacle

    pep. Maybe - I wasn't there

  138. oli has joined

  139. Zash

    debacle: https://media.ccc.de/v/35c3-9596-no_evidence_of_communication_and_morality_in_protocols_off-the-record_protocol_version_4

  140. pep.

    Basically they are now using the double ratchet thing, doing PFS (now?), but still only 1:1 (resource to resource)

  141. jjrh has left

  142. jjrh has left

  143. Zash has left

  144. jjrh has left

  145. debacle has left

  146. alameyo has left

  147. alameyo has joined

  148. alameyo has left

  149. debacle has joined

  150. Guus has left

  151. alameyo has joined

  152. oli has joined

  153. Thanos has joined

  154. goffi has joined

  155. Remko has left

  156. oli has joined

  157. oli has joined

  158. ralphm has left

  159. Zash has left

  160. oli has left

  161. Vaulor has left

  162. sezuan has left

  163. oli has left

  164. Tobias has left

  165. debacle has left