XMPP Summit - 2020-02-02

  1. larma has left
  2. Steven Roose has left
  3. larma has joined
  4. goffi has left
  5. eevvoor has left
  6. moparisthebest pep., fair , also I think spellcheck might have mangled the message in parens or I don't get it
  7. Steven Roose has joined
  8. adiaholic has joined
  9. thdouk has joined
  10. thdouk has left
  11. Steven Roose has left
  12. Link Mauve has left
  13. thdouk has joined
  14. thdouk has left
  15. SubPub has joined
  16. adiaholic has left
  17. adiaholic has joined
  18. Zash has left
  19. thdouk has joined
  20. thdouk has left
  21. kusoneko has left
  22. kusoneko has joined
  23. SubPub has left
  24. kusoneko has left
  25. kusoneko has joined
  26. thdouk has joined
  27. thdouk has left
  28. thdouk has joined
  29. thdouk has left
  30. moparisthebest has left
  31. moparisthebest has joined
  32. thdouk has joined
  33. kusoneko has left
  34. kusoneko has joined
  35. kusoneko has left
  36. kusoneko has joined
  37. thdouk has left
  38. kusoneko has left
  39. kusoneko has joined
  40. kusoneko has left
  41. kusoneko has joined
  42. Andrzej has joined
  43. Andrzej has left
  44. Tobias has joined
  45. Daniel > In germany you don't have the right on your picture anymore when you attend public events like concerts, summits and so on. I guess it's more or less the same in other European countries. The summit arguably isn't a public event
  46. Daniel It's also doesn't matter if it's legal or not. It's just not cool
  47. vanitasvitae has left
  48. winfried has left
  49. vanitasvitae has joined
  50. winfried has joined
  51. MattJ There is no barrier to entry, it's open to anyone who says they want to attend. Not sure if there is a specific definition of "public event", but it fits mine
  52. MattJ Anyway, I think two things: if you're at such an event, you can't assume that the default is that no photos will be taken, you should always check (if you care)
  53. MattJ Regardless, I think we should make the policy clear in future events, and I'd personally prefer that policy to be "no photos without notifying the room first"
  54. MattJ And wow I overslept
  55. kusoneko has left
  56. kusoneko has joined
  57. kusoneko has left
  58. kusoneko has joined
  59. Daniel Most people know everyone else. I know and are known by more people at summit than at the average party. While the theoretically barrier to entry is low it practice its just 'us'
  60. Daniel Most people know everyone else. I know and are known by more people at summit than at the average party. While the theoretically barrier to entry is low it practice it's just 'us'
  61. Daniel > Regardless, I think we should make the policy clear in future events, and I'd personally prefer that policy to be "no photos without notifying the room first" Yes making it explicit is the obvious solution to avoid any confusion
  62. thdouk has joined
  63. thdouk has left
  64. winfried has left
  65. winfried has joined
  66. Link Mauve has joined
  67. winfried has left
  68. winfried has joined
  69. pep. Personally I don't want to involve legalities in this, as Daniel says it's "not cool". Ultimately I want the burden of checking on those taking the pictures. I've been to quite a few events now where you'll get a different color lanyard if you don't want to appear in pictures (and they are careful to ask you when you arrive). Others like CCC it's just normal to ask.
  70. pep. and if you take a picture with lots of people in it you just blur/hide faces
  71. pep. (at least)
  72. goffi has joined
  73. pep. but in any case explicit is better than implicit.
  74. Steven Roose has joined
  75. dwd has left
  76. dwd has joined
  77. Daniel At previous summits people asked before taking a group picture too. So it's very likely that the person in question just forgot about it and there was no harm intended. I guess that's why the ietf puts up a note well in front of every single session as a friendly reminder.
  78. dwd has left
  79. dwd has joined
  80. winfried has left
  81. winfried has joined
  82. kingu has joined
  83. thdouk has joined
  84. winfried has left
  85. winfried has joined
  86. dwd has left
  87. dwd has joined
  88. thdouk has left
  89. Zash has joined
  90. winfried My talk on XMPP will be in appr. 15 minutes in UD2.208 (room is tucked away quite far). There are still plenty of seats free.
  91. COM8 has joined
  92. COM8 has left
  93. COM8 has joined
  94. COM8 has left
  95. eevvoor has joined
  96. COM8 has joined
  97. COM8 has left
  98. zash has joined
  99. Steven Roose has left
  100. eevvoor I agree to make it explicit. I do definitely not want photos from me, and I cannot check all the time. So this schould be the default.
  101. eevvoor I agree to make it explicit. I do definitely not want photos from me, and I cannot check all the time. So this should be the default.
  102. debacle has joined
  103. eevvoor Can we avoid googledocs in future for the organisation, to talk about another privacy issue ... ?
  104. pep. yep I'd also like that. it's a bit less easy to settle than just saying "please ask before taking pictures" though. baby steps
  105. jabberjocke has left
  106. jabberjocke has joined
  107. thdouk has joined
  108. thdouk has left
  109. COM8 has joined
  110. COM8 has left
  111. goffi has left
  112. ecschi has joined
  113. ecschi has left
  114. Steven Roose has joined
  115. winfried has left
  116. winfried has joined
  117. winfried has left
  118. winfried has joined
  119. winfried has left
  120. winfried has joined
  121. COM8 has joined
  122. COM8 has left
  123. thdouk has joined
  124. COM8 has joined
  125. kingu has left
  126. COM8 has left
  127. winfried has left
  128. winfried has joined
  129. lsdlfjljuie has joined
  130. winfried has left
  131. winfried has joined
  132. nyco Two hoodies sold: where do we report/acount that?
  133. jabberjocke has left
  134. jabberjocke has joined
  135. lsdlfjljuie has left
  136. jabberjocke has left
  137. eevvoor has left
  138. winfried has left
  139. winfried has joined
  140. thdouk has left
  141. jabberjocke has joined
  142. jabberjocke has left
  143. jabberjocke has joined
  144. adiaholic has left
  145. adiaholic has joined
  146. winfried has left
  147. winfried has joined
  148. winfried has left
  149. winfried has joined
  150. jabberjocke has left
  151. jabberjocke has joined
  152. kingu has joined
  153. larma has left
  154. larma has joined
  155. jonas’ before it’s too late, I already wish everyone safe travels when returning from Summit/FOSDEM.
  156. jonas’ especially the now-ex EU folks.
  157. jabberjocke has left
  158. jabberjocke has joined
  159. jabberjocke has left
  160. jabberjocke has joined
  161. thdouk has joined
  162. kusoneko has left
  163. kusoneko has joined
  164. kusoneko has left
  165. kusoneko has joined
  166. thdouk has left
  167. winfried has left
  168. winfried has joined
  169. kingu has left
  170. kingu has joined
  171. thdouk has joined
  172. COM8 has joined
  173. COM8 has left
  174. winfried has left
  175. winfried has joined
  176. thdouk has left
  177. kingu has left
  178. winfried has left
  179. winfried has joined
  180. jabberjocke has left
  181. jabberjocke has joined
  182. COM8 has joined
  183. COM8 has left
  184. adiaholic has left
  185. adiaholic has joined
  186. jabberjocke has left
  187. jabberjocke has joined
  188. thdouk has joined
  189. Syndace has left
  190. Syndace has joined
  191. jabberjocke has left
  192. jabberjocke has joined
  193. vanitasvitae has left
  194. vanitasvitae has joined
  195. thdouk has left
  196. kusoneko has left
  197. kusoneko has joined
  198. kusoneko has left
  199. kusoneko has joined
  200. jabberjocke has left
  201. alameyo has left
  202. alameyo has joined
  203. jabberjocke has joined
  204. Alex has left
  205. vanitasvitae has left
  206. vanitasvitae has joined
  207. Alex has joined
  208. winfried has left
  209. winfried has joined
  210. winfried has left
  211. winfried has joined
  212. winfried has left
  213. winfried has joined
  214. jabberjocke has left
  215. jabberjocke has joined
  216. nyco thx a lot, safe travel to all as well, it's been awesome this year!
  217. jabberjocke has left
  218. jabberjocke has joined
  219. thdouk has joined
  220. vanitasvitae The matrix guys' cross signing solution is basically our master key stuff
  221. vanitasvitae :D
  222. vanitasvitae Exactly what we discussed :P
  223. thdouk has left
  224. debacle has left
  225. goffi has joined
  226. eevvoor has joined
  227. alameyo has left
  228. alameyo has joined
  229. thdouk has joined
  230. jabberjocke has left
  231. Kev has left
  232. jabberjocke has joined
  233. alameyo has left
  234. alameyo has joined
  235. kusoneko has left
  236. kusoneko has joined
  237. kusoneko has left
  238. kusoneko has joined
  239. thdouk has left
  240. jabberjocke has left
  241. jabberjocke has joined
  242. winfried has left
  243. winfried has joined
  244. winfried has left
  245. winfried has joined
  246. nyco Dino is covered on Hacker News, congrats!
  247. vanitasvitae I had a very nice talk with Matthew.
  248. winfried vanitasvitae: any interesting results from that talk?
  249. vanitasvitae Mostly that we should embrace our similarities and should learn from another instead of having this "messenger war".
  250. vanitasvitae But we also agreed that this war is mostly fueled by a few. And most of those are non-developer members of the community.
  251. winfried Yeah, I got Matthew on board for a comparison of Matrix and XMPP highlighing the strenghs of each project in stead of breaking down....
  252. nyco Matthew sparks and maintains this war... At POSS, he wrote and said XMPP was "monolythic"
  253. larma has left
  254. larma has joined
  255. nyco I had a nice chat with Manu, their CTO, who couldn'd come at POSS: very polite
  256. thdouk has joined
  257. thdouk has left
  258. eevvoor has left
  259. adiaholic has left
  260. adiaholic has joined
  261. vanitasvitae has left
  262. vanitasvitae has joined
  263. winfried has left
  264. winfried has joined
  265. winfried has left
  266. winfried has joined
  267. winfried has left
  268. winfried has joined
  269. thdouk has joined
  270. winfried has left
  271. winfried has joined
  272. winfried has left
  273. winfried has joined
  274. thdouk has left
  275. winfried has left
  276. winfried has joined
  277. winfried has left
  278. winfried has joined
  279. winfried has left
  280. winfried has joined
  281. winfried has left
  282. winfried has joined
  283. winfried has left
  284. winfried has joined
  285. winfried has left
  286. winfried has joined
  287. winfried has left
  288. winfried has joined
  289. winfried has left
  290. winfried has joined
  291. thdouk has joined
  292. debacle has joined
  293. winfried The only thing I can find in XMPP that is monolithic and that isn't monolithic in Matrix is the management of a MUC/MIX, but it is an interesting question if the matrix model is better....
  294. winfried has left
  295. winfried has joined
  296. zash What does that even mean?
  297. MattJ vanitasvitae, oh, it was you who leaked the FOSDEM invite link :D
  298. vanitasvitae Was that a mistake? :D
  299. MattJ I didn't want it to go viral and have to deal with that - I was trying to limit it to people who came in person to the stand
  300. MattJ I even had backup QR/NFC tags prepared in case I needed to revoke the invite token :)
  301. MattJ FWIW I don't mind, everything is fine :)
  302. Steven Roose has left
  303. thdouk has left
  304. MattJ I guessed it had happened when I saw e.g. debacle sign up, who wasn't even at FOSDEM
  305. winfried zash: that is the better question 😁
  306. MattJ FWIW I don't think there is a "war", I also don't think that "monolithic" is a bad thing, but I *also* don't see any way you could describe XMPP as monolithic
  307. MattJ I'd describe it as quite the opposite: quite fragmented
  308. MattJ Matrix is monolithic: they have one spec (well, one c2s, one s2s) and one implementation
  309. winfried Yeah, so many variables to compare on, so many ways to judge them...
  310. larma MattJ: but dendrite and all the non-riot clients
  311. winfried Still wondering what I got myself into...
  312. MattJ dendrite doesn't work, and pretty much none of the non-riot clients impelement everything (and also riot implements a bunch of stuff that isn't in the spec)
  313. MattJ winfried, it's a very difficult task indeed
  314. larma XMPP Clients also don't implement everything
  315. larma And don't they use dendrite for their p2p matrix thingee?
  316. MattJ We don't expect them to :)
  317. winfried MattJ: yeah, but good comparison would still help me....
  318. MattJ One of the Matrix selling points is that they only have one spec, and no mess of extensions
  319. larma Stop expecting it from matrix clients then
  320. MattJ I'm not expecting it, it's basically what they advertise as one of the primary benefits of Matrix over XMPP
  321. larma Do they still claim that? I think they mostly stopped doing that since around Matrix 1.0
  322. MattJ I personally think it's inevitable if you have an open ecosystem (as we and Matrix do)
  323. MattJ So now there is no difference between Matrix and XMPP? :)
  324. zash Instead of a mess of extension proposals, they have a mess of change proposals. Completely different!
  325. larma > We think of Matrix and XMPP as being quite different; at its core Matrix can be thought of as an eventually consistent global JSON db with an HTTP API and pubsub semantics - whilst XMPP can be thought of as a message passing protocol.
  326. larma Except that xmpp also has pubsub sementics in mix
  327. larma But we don't have a JSON based http api!
  328. larma Huge difference
  329. winfried Absolutely!
  330. MattJ zash would like to disagree
  331. pep. larma: yet? :p
  332. pep. and yeah, mod_rest
  333. zash mod_rest !
  334. MattJ Prosody has multiple, latest (and most comprehensive): https://modules.prosody.im/mod_rest
  335. larma That's non standard!
  336. zash Que confusion with ejabberds mod_rest
  337. MattJ and I think most other servers have one too - we just need a standard :)
  338. larma But yeah so basically no difference then
  339. MattJ (I personally think a standard would be very very sensible)
  340. pep. that was on the summit list
  341. MattJ It's one of the topics I don't think we reached
  342. MattJ We need a whole week!
  343. pep. I wasn't ready to accept http personally :x
  344. pep. and JSON.
  345. MattJ You don't have to, but it's convenient for some people/use-cases
  346. Andrzej has joined
  347. dwd has left
  348. dwd has joined
  349. larma I personally would prefer if we used XML instead of json...
  350. larma For the rest api
  351. zash mod_rest does both
  352. larma zash: talking about the standard to be ;)
  353. larma The summit topic was unfortunately mentioning json, which might have scared some off
  354. ivucica XEP-0295 pls
  355. adiaholic has left
  356. adiaholic has joined
  357. lsdlfjljuie has joined
  358. Daniel has left
  359. winfried has left
  360. winfried has joined
  361. Daniel has joined
  362. Daniel has left
  363. Daniel has joined
  364. Ge0rG User defined data transfer please?
  365. lsdlfjljuie has left
  366. MattJ Can't tell if joking
  367. Ge0rG http://catb.org/jargon/html/H/ha-ha-only-serious.html
  368. thdouk has joined
  369. Ge0rG I should have suggested fixing the name into "developer defined data transfer"
  370. Ge0rG > Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, commonly known as DDT, is a colorless, tasteless, and almost odorless crystalline chemical compound,[5] an organochlorine. Originally developed as an insecticide, it became infamous for its environmental impacts. Toxic. Poisonous. Also a Russian rock band.
  371. thdouk has left
  372. Steven Roose has joined
  373. winfried has left
  374. winfried has joined
  375. alameyo has left
  376. alameyo has joined
  377. Intosi Hello home. Thanks for a very productive Summit and your help at FOSDEM!
  378. MattJ Glad you got home safe (and in good time) - agreed, this was a good few days, thanks to everyone who participated at the summit and at the stand
  379. thdouk has joined
  380. thdouk has left
  381. winfried has left
  382. winfried has joined
  383. Andrzej has left
  384. winfried has left
  385. winfried has joined
  386. thdouk has joined
  387. thdouk has left
  388. adiaholic has left
  389. adiaholic has joined
  390. adiaholic has left
  391. adiaholic has joined
  392. thdouk has joined
  393. thdouk has left
  394. vanitasvitae I agree. I had a great time at fosdem and the summit was especially nice this year. Thanks to everyone who participated in it and made it such a pleasant experience!
  395. adiaholic has left
  396. adiaholic has joined
  397. pep. I haven't had a look at the minutes since summit. I'll try to dump that in the wiki tomorrow
  398. goffi has left
  399. adiaholic has left