XSF Discussion - 2011-11-23

  1. koski has joined

  2. Tobias has joined

  3. Tobias has left

  4. Tobias has joined

  5. Tobias has left

  6. luca tagliaferri has joined

  7. luca tagliaferri has left

  8. luca tagliaferri has joined

  9. Tobias has joined

  10. Tobias has left

  11. Tobias has joined

  12. Tobias has left

  13. Tobias has joined

  14. luca tagliaferri has left

  15. luca tagliaferri has joined

  16. Tobias has joined

  17. koski has left

  18. koski has joined

  19. koski has left

  20. stpeter has joined

  21. Ashley Roach has joined

  22. stpeter

    hi Ashley!

  23. Ashley Roach


  24. stpeter

    it seems that Florian won't be able to make it

  25. stpeter

    I don't have a JID for Chris Christou

  26. Ashley has joined

  27. Ashley Roach has joined

  28. Ashley has joined

  29. Ashley

    On the good news front, I've made some progress with the marketing folks at Cisco per my earlier email

  30. stpeter

    I admit to being out of the loop because of my trip to Taipei last week

  31. Ashley

    sure, of course :)

  32. stpeter

    aha, there's a JID for Chris at http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Chris_Christou_for_Board_2011

  33. Ashley Roach has joined

  34. Ashley has joined

  35. Kev

    Ashley: I note that you're using a gmail.com JID, and that service has bugs that prevent proper working with MUC rooms.

  36. Kev

    Ashley: particularly, you're going to be changing nicks every five minutes until you log off, now.

  37. Ashley

    oh goodie

  38. Kev

    Or three minutes, or whatever their timer is set to.

  39. Kev

    I suggest you don't change nicknames in a MUC room while using a Google Talk account.

  40. Kev

    (Well, actually, I suggest not using Google Talk accounts with MUC at all, but the above is a more moderate suggestion)

  41. Much Better Ashley has joined

  42. Ashley has left

  43. Ashley Roach has joined

  44. Much Better Ashley


  45. stpeter


  46. stpeter

    Ashley Roach: you might be happier with your @cisco.com JID :)

  47. Much Better Ashley

    yeah, i guess that'd work too

  48. Kev

    For the benefit of us plebs without such priviledged information, are we expecting a meeting today? (i.e. do we have apologies from anyone etc.)

  49. bear

    today was a "hi, i'm Foo" meeting with some minimal discussion if enough showed up

  50. waqas has joined

  51. bear

    I wasn't expecting anything formal except, maybe, a meeting time decision

  52. Kev

    I have an agenda request for the first formal meeting :)

  53. stpeter


  54. Kev

    I'd like to split the board list in two, so we have board@xmpp.org and board-incamera@xmpp.org or such.

  55. Kev

    And that while the second list (not open) is available when necessary, mundane things like meeting schedules and apologies and the like are all handled on the former, which would be open (for subscribing and reading).

  56. Kev

    (I'm not convinced that a great amount of the Board discussion needs to be in camera, but at least this provides a means to it where necessary)

  57. bear

    sounds like a great discussion for our first meeting :)

  58. stpeter

    ok, finished with my W3C conference call, now I have more attention

  59. Kev

    It also provides a means for interested parties to track discussions where (shock, horror, it could never happen) there's the possibility of Board maybe dropping the ball on something, such that they can effectively chase progress.

  60. Kev

    On top of the obvious openness.

  61. Tobias has joined

  62. stpeter

    I'm all in favor of transparency

  63. Kev

    Well done Tobias, there's now as many Council members at the first Board meeting as there are Board members :D

  64. stpeter

    another option is to have most of the discussion on the members@ list

  65. Tobias

    Kev, yay

  66. stpeter

    and use board@ for truly private matters

  67. Kev

    stpeter: I have no problem with board having a non-noisey list to which us plebs can't post, if that's what they'd like.

  68. bear

    +1 to that option

  69. Kev

    bear: Which option

  70. Kev


  71. bear

    very little the board discusses is private, no reason to not use members@ for most things and use board@ for the other

  72. stpeter


  73. Kev

    That works for me, naturally :)

  74. bear

    it's kinda how we were leaning towards the end of last term

  75. Much Better Ashley

    i like the idea of using the members list, would we add [board] to the subject?

  76. bear

    so we should just start that way with this board

  77. bear

    ashley - that would work

  78. Kev

    Much Better Ashley: That seems a sensible suggestion. Or just obvious subject lines like "Board agenda" :)

  79. Much Better Ashley

    the other possibility, but adds work, is to post board minutes and the like to the members list

  80. Kev

    Much Better Ashley: I want realtime access, rather than belated :)

  81. Kev

    The minutes already get posted.

  82. Much Better Ashley

    seems like extra overhead that none of us would really want to do anyway

  83. Will has joined

  84. Much Better Ashley

    Kev: k

  85. stpeter


  86. stpeter

    well, we even have former Board members here ;-)

  87. Much Better Ashley

    so, to summarize use members@ for majority of conversation; board@ is for private or coordination

  88. Kev

    Much Better Ashley: s/or coordination//

  89. Much Better Ashley


  90. stpeter

    Kev: we might want to talk about culling the number of @xmpp.org lists sometime, too -- do we really need ws-xmpp@xmpp.org for instance? ;-)

  91. Kev

    (If by coordination you mean things like arranging meetings, etc. I hadn't realised there was a board meeting now, for example, nor even after I'd noticed it in the calendar did I know which Board members were expecting to turn up :))

  92. stpeter

    Kev: right, exactly

  93. Kev

    stpeter: I'm all up for a cull.

  94. bear

    kev - the first meeting was tough because of travel, holidays, etc - and today was more of a "hey, peter is available, let's do it"

  95. Kev


  96. Kev

    But by discussing this in public, us mere Members would know this :)

  97. MattJ has joined

  98. stpeter

    Kev: do we really need the council@ list? coordination items could be discussed on the standards@ list :)

  99. stpeter foresees the day when we have only two lists, standards@ and members@ :)

  100. MattJ

    I like jdev

  101. stpeter

    that's at jabber.org :P

  102. MattJ

    Good point :)

  103. Kev

    stpeter: If people want to do that, I'm not strictly opposed.

  104. MattJ

    Me neither, to be honest

  105. waqas

    By the way, can someone delete the board@muc.xmpp.org room, if board meetings are supposed to be here?

  106. Kev

    I have a slight concern with whether it'd get noisey.

  107. Kev

    (Which is also why I proposed opening the Board list, rather than having everything on members@)

  108. stpeter

    I'll take a look at http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo sometime soon

  109. waqas has left

  110. Kev

    But as long as we keep the option to revert to council@ if it gets silly I certainly don't have a problem with a trial on standards@

  111. waqas has joined

  112. stpeter

    Kev: I realize that people can subscribe to council@ but somehow I doubt they do :)

  113. Kev

    Maybe that's ok, though, if they don't care.

  114. stpeter

    waqas: MattJ can do that, I think

  115. stpeter checks to see if he has perms

  116. MattJ nods, I'll do it now

  117. stpeter

    thanks, MattJ!

  118. stpeter

    Kev: but I suppose I can bring up Council communication policies in the Council meeting :)

  119. Kev

    You can, as long as you don't take it over 30 minutes.

  120. stpeter


  121. Will has left

  122. stpeter needs to install a jabber client on his shiny new iphone

  123. bear gavels the unstarted board meeting closed

  124. stpeter laughs

  125. Kev

    bear: Thanks :D

  126. stpeter

    this was just a sound check, it seems

  127. bear

    I know how much the Council loves punctuality and short meetings :)

  128. Much Better Ashley

    is the xsf meeting in Feb 2012 happening?

  129. Kev

    I believe so.

  130. Kev

    Or, at least, there's a discussion about it later today :)

  131. stpeter

    anyway there will be various FOSDEM activities

  132. Much Better Ashley

    k, i don't see it yet on the world wide webs, and i'm seeing if i can get cisco to sponsor something

  133. Kev

    I don't suppose Cisco have London offices instead? :D

  134. stpeter

    whether there will be more than that (e.g., Friday and Monday meetings), remains to be seen

  135. Much Better Ashley

    i have no idea

  136. Much Better Ashley

    but i have to imagine they do

  137. stpeter

    Cisco has offices everywhere

  138. Kev

    (I have a long standing grumble about Brussels not being my favourite place, but truth be told I'm lazy and don't like travelling to foreign climes)

  139. stpeter

    there's a fairly big office north of London, IIRC

  140. Much Better Ashley

    i was thinking along the lines of schwag and/or something related to hackathon/dev challenge

  141. stpeter

    we almost held an IESG retreat there, but the office was closed for the Royal Wedding™

  142. Tobias


  143. Much Better Ashley

    maybe a t-shirt like — i participated in this hackathon, and all i got was a lousy t-shirt

  144. Much Better Ashley


  145. Much Better Ashley

    but hopefully something a little more enticing

  146. stpeter

    Much Better Ashley: we can always give a Cius ;-)

  147. Much Better Ashley

    anyway, sounds like i can press ahead, and we'll see what i can get

  148. Much Better Ashley

    stpeter: you joke, but that's one of my options :)

  149. Much Better Ashley

    it has xmpp on board i hear

  150. Much Better Ashley

    are we done?

  151. stpeter


  152. stpeter

    we've all moved to the council@ chatroom :)

  153. Much Better Ashley

    ADD board

  154. bear


  155. bear

    if this time works for the US side of the house, then we need to confirm that it's ok for the EU side

  156. Much Better Ashley


  157. Much Better Ashley

    works great for me

  158. bear

    me also, and I think sans holiday-travel-burnout, it works for peter

  159. stpeter


  160. Tobias has joined

  161. Tobias has joined

  162. luca tagliaferri has left

  163. Steffen Larsen has joined

  164. Florian has joined

  165. Florian

    hi there

  166. MattJ


  167. MattJ

    Is the FOSDEM meeting in here?

  168. Florian

    there's a FOSDEM meeting?

  169. Steffen Larsen

    in 30 minutes

  170. Florian

    ah yes, it seems that's today

  171. MattJ

    I don't think a venue was mentioned, but I'm assuming it's here

  172. MattJ

    I wonder if stpeter remembers :)

  173. Steffen Larsen

    have to check my mail

  174. Steffen Larsen

    no.. there was no muc in the mail

  175. Steffen Larsen

    but i assume it is here

  176. Steffen Larsen has left

  177. Steffen Larsen has joined

  178. stpeter

    yep, this is the place, sorry about not mentioning a venue

  179. stpeter


  180. stpeter invites ralphm

  181. ralphm has joined

  182. ralphm


  183. Florian

    evening all

  184. MattJ


  185. stpeter

    hey Ralph

  186. stpeter

    now the party can begin :)

  187. ralphm

    I appear to be experiencing some lag

  188. ralphm


  189. ralphm

    FOSDEM 2012, the place to be

  190. stpeter


  191. ralphm

    We have secured a Devroom on Saturday.

  192. stpeter

    maybe this year we can send in our devroom schedule on time ;-)

  193. ralphm


  194. stpeter

    linuxwolf said he could give a talk about end-to-end encryption (everyone's favorite topic)

  195. ralphm

    The deadline for submission of our schedule to the FOSDEM crew is 21 January

  196. stpeter


  197. stpeter

    so we need to start recruiting early

  198. ralphm

    So I think we should close submissions around the 7th

  199. stpeter


  200. stpeter

    ralphm: how many talks to we need? I assume we have only the morning or only the afternoon

  201. stpeter


  202. ralphm

    Unlike other years, we should be able to use 8 hours in the room

  203. stpeter


  204. stpeter

    not sure we have that much to say ;-)

  205. MattJ

    Oh dear, does this mean I don't get away with not submitting a talk?

  206. stpeter

    MattJ: correct!

  207. stpeter

    I suppose that someone might be able to give the traditional "XMPP 101" talk :)

  208. stpeter

    I am not yet sure if I will travel to FOSDEM

  209. Florian


  210. Florian


  211. stpeter

    but probably I'll end up being there

  212. ralphm

    they aren't sure yet about the exact times, but they figure they should be able to open the rooms at 9:30 or 10:00, to ensure session can start at 10:30, and the rooms will be closed at 18:30

  213. stpeter


  214. Florian

    we have the whole day?

  215. stpeter

    Florian: so it seems

  216. ralphm

    https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/devroom-managers/2011-November/000000.html gives some background information

  217. ralphm

    So this is really cool

  218. ralphm

    As for the room itself, this year it will be H.2213, which is in the H building, the same building that the registration desk is at.

  219. MattJ


  220. Steffen Larsen

    why not H.264? ;-)

  221. ralphm


  222. stpeter


  223. ralphm

    I believe this room is one level above the hallways

  224. ralphm

    it has 100 seats

  225. stpeter

    it would be nice to have something related to xmpp and the web -- how to use some of the javascript libraries to do simple things like embed presence or basic chat in a web page

  226. ralphm

    If anyone has been to the MySQL devroom last year, it is that room.

  227. stpeter

    maybe I'll play around with some of the bot frameworks (I've been meaning to anyway) and give a talk about fun things you can do with bots in chatrooms (although other people are more qualified to talk about such things than I am :)

  228. ralphm


  229. Steffen Larsen

    or components maybe

  230. stpeter

    Steffen Larsen: are you volunteering? ;-)

  231. stpeter


  232. Steffen Larsen

    stpeter: heh.. my GF will kill me if I go.. we just bought a house, and we are getting the keys at 1.feb. :-)

  233. MattJ

    brb, I have a pesky cat that wants feeding

  234. stpeter

    ralphm: is there anything else we need to plan? e.g., the stand?

  235. waqas has left

  236. ralphm

    I think it might be fruitful to give a list of suggestions of topics that people might want to submit a talk for

  237. Steffen Larsen

    but i really wanted to do a presentation.. let me see if i can do something about it

  238. stpeter

    Steffen Larsen: whatever works for you

  239. ralphm

    I've seen that done in other devrooms' call for participation

  240. stpeter

    ralphm: yes

  241. ralphm

    and then that call should be sent out

  242. stpeter

    how about a talk about the billion laughs attack?

  243. Florian

    how about the stands?

  244. Florian

    did we apply?

  245. ralphm

    on the FOSDEM mailinglist, our own list(s) and on the site

  246. ralphm

    ok, stands

  247. ralphm

    we did *not* yet apply

  248. stpeter

    ralphm: agreed

  249. ralphm

    and this has to do with people with plans for doing stuff

  250. Florian

    are applications open?

  251. ralphm

    I'm looking at dwd and florian here

  252. ralphm

    Applications are open already, but I wanted to have a good story ready before the actual submission.

  253. Florian

    dwd and I talked about it a few weeks ago

  254. Florian

    to do something different ... i.e. get a sort of "lounge"y space

  255. Florian

    so no table, but nice chairs

  256. Florian

    and some projectors

  257. stpeter

    do such spaces exist?

  258. ralphm

    the submission deadline is Dec 13.

  259. Florian


  260. ralphm

    Usually, 'stands' are one table, but you can also request two

  261. Florian

    the space could be anywhere, we just remove the "table"

  262. stpeter


  263. ralphm

    depending how good of a plan we have, we might want to request two

  264. ralphm

    to have enough space to pull this off

  265. Florian


  266. ralphm

    stpeter: I'm not sure. Some things will be done differently this year.

  267. stpeter


  268. ralphm

    I don't think the normal hallways would be very suitable for this, though.

  269. stpeter

    it's not necessary to do everything the same way every year :)

  270. ralphm

    I like the lounge idea.

  271. Florian

    ralphm: could you find out if we'd be allowed to offer coffee?

  272. stpeter

    BTW, the federated social web folks did not get a room but might want to be active -- we could think about giving them some time on our 8-hour agenda

  273. Florian

    stpeter: sounds good

  274. ralphm

    stpeter: yes, indeed. Did someone contact you about this?

  275. stpeter

    ralphm: no, I just noticed a thread about it on their w3c.org list

  276. stpeter

    forwarding to members@xmpp.org

  277. ralphm

    hm, I'm not actually on that list

  278. stpeter


  279. stpeter

    there's a link on that page (it's a mailto: URL)

  280. Florian

    ok, so for the stands, does anyone else have some ideas?

  281. stpeter


  282. stpeter

    I too like the lounge idea

  283. Florian

    "The Real-time Lounge

  284. Florian


  285. stpeter


  286. Florian

    with some XMPP demos on projectors

  287. Florian

    something like jack's Wall of Porn

  288. Florian

    or anything else that's awesome and uses XMPP

  289. dwd

    Evening. Sorry I'm asoutndingly late. My meeting overan. By a few hours.

  290. Florian

    preferably with which the FOSDEM users can interact with

  291. stpeter

    I wish I could get someone from http://www.skyalert.org/ to give a talk :)

  292. stpeter

    so that's one action item: find cool things to demonstrate

  293. dwd

    Right. Cool things, which needn't be *technically* cool. Just cool to look at.

  294. stpeter

    right :)

  295. dwd

    Ralph mentioned he could spin up some realtime social network stream, which sounded like a crowd-pleaser.

  296. stpeter

    yeah, everyone is getting so social these days....

  297. ralphm

    Yes, I'll see if I can put that up, as I will be leaving Mediamatic Lab.

  298. stpeter

    http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/jabberpad/id372857200?mt=8 might be a fun thing to demo

  299. stpeter

    although I don't have an iPad (yet)

  300. Florian

    I have one

  301. dwd

    Bear in mind we need to at least pretend the stuff we're demoing is open source, or uses open source, or something.

  302. stpeter

    that app might be open source, I can't remember

  303. MattJ

    stpeter, the whole world was anti-social before Twitter

  304. MattJ

    Nobody ever spoke to anyone else

  305. ralphm

    dwd: indeed

  306. stpeter

    MattJ: so true, and I long for the good old days :P

  307. dwd

    MattJ, TO be fair, I still try not to.

  308. ralphm

    dwd: although in our case, open protocols is good, too

  309. stpeter

    do we want or need to hold a hackfest or summit before or after FOSDEM itself?

  310. Much Better Ashley

    alternatively, could we spin up a prototype/demo that could be the subject of a talk — maybe that's what dwd said though

  311. ralphm

    stpeter: I think so, yes

  312. Much Better Ashley

    i'd like to see an open version of turntable.fm using xmpp

  313. Florian

    that would be awesome

  314. Florian

    especially as turntable.fm is not available in the UK

  315. stpeter

    ralphm: I was hoping we'd have made some progress on the XMPP validator before then so that we could make it the focus of hacking, but alas that might not be possible at this point

  316. Florian

    ah ... speaking of XMPP Validator

  317. Florian

    should we do the Summit on Friday / Monday?

  318. dwd

    Given we have free 3G in Brussels (I assume, Florian?), we might be able to knock up a demo involving Buddycloud and positioning. I'd imagine we could show which XSF people were where in FOSDEM.

  319. Florian

    yup, 3G this year

  320. dwd

    Florian, Depends on whether we can get a room somewhere.

  321. Florian

    I think the Cisco venue was great

  322. MattJ

    Much Better Ashley, FWIW http://listeninghall.com/ is XMPP-based (kind of like Turntable but for YouTube)

  323. Florian

    any chance of getting that this year again? stpeter?

  324. MattJ

    and the client code is on github (not the server code, but I think that could be arranged)

  325. stpeter

    Florian: I assume we can do that again this year

  326. Florian


  327. Florian


  328. MattJ

    http://listeninghall.com/#/prosody :)

  329. dwd

    MattJ, Do you know these guys?

  330. MattJ

    Keeping tabs on XSF people around Brussels would be a useful app in its own right (based on the past couple of years)

  331. dwd

    MattJ, Yes, helps us keep an eye on them.

  332. MattJ

    dwd, guy, and yes

  333. Florian

    anyway ... getting back to the conversation :)

  334. stpeter


  335. dwd

    MattJ, That's a demo candidate, right there.

  336. MattJ


  337. Florian

    yes, some mobile app that does location

  338. Florian

    on a map

  339. dwd gets back to the conversation.

  340. Florian

    and maybe even webbrowser capable

  341. stpeter

    do we need two days for hacking/summiteering, or just one?

  342. dwd

    Florian, Possibly, but note that Buddycloud does it in text and having "Near Room H.264" might actualyl be better.

  343. Florian


  344. dwd

    Florian, It should get that precise with WiFi beacons, too, I think.

  345. ralphm

    stpeter: I prefer two days outside of FOSDEM

  346. stpeter

    ralphm: yeah but do we have anything to talk about / work on?

  347. ralphm

    stpeter: do you have the feeling we ran out of topics last year?

  348. stpeter

    ralphm: well, last year we had the internationalization madness to discuss

  349. dwd

    ralphm, The usual problem isn't not talking enough, it's having anything come of it.

  350. Florian

    my head still hurts from taht

  351. Florian

    my head still hurts from that

  352. stpeter

    dwd: this is true

  353. dwd

    Florian, You are already internationalized, too.

  354. ralphm

    dwd: indeed. I'd like smaller, more organized sessions

  355. Florian 's head goes boom

  356. stpeter

    ralphm: with action items and follow-through

  357. ralphm

    stpeter: ye

  358. ralphm


  359. Florian

    yes, I think the S2S testing was good

  360. stpeter

    I'm sick of talking about specs :)

  361. dwd

    ralphm, I'm not sure that has histroically worked either. Perhaps if we concentrated on specs that are nearing Last Call, say, that might work.

  362. Florian

    maybe we should actually "book" the room this year, so that we don't get kicked out again :)

  363. stpeter

    Florian: noted!

  364. ralphm

    I've been trying to recall stuff from the little circle dissussion on pubsub+muc

  365. dwd doesn't remember being kicked out.

  366. stpeter

    dwd: of the side room

  367. Florian

    right :)

  368. stpeter

    Florian: next time I'll book more of those side rooms

  369. dwd

    stpeter, Oh, right. That'll be why.

  370. stpeter

    I know for the BOSH testing, those guys were really just getting started

  371. stpeter

    but that's always true of testing -- set up takes a lot of time

  372. ralphm

    I think to do that properly, some of those session might need to be planned ahead of the event

  373. stpeter

    I don't particularly want to book two days of non-FOSDEM meetings if we're not going to make productive use of the time

  374. ralphm

    so people can pick what they'd like to participate in

  375. stpeter


  376. Florian


  377. ralphm

    This could also include: hack something to be shown in the lounge

  378. stpeter

    hmm, just re-reading the federated social web thread, those guys are talking about holding a one-day meeting before or after FOSDEM -- it might make sense to have that be a focus for one of the summit days (although that's not a purely xmpp topic)

  379. ralphm

    (provided we get one)

  380. dwd

    I'd be happier doing interop/hackery one day and discussion the other.

  381. dwd

    And interop - yeah, I think we'd like to do BOSH stuff.

  382. stpeter

    dwd: yeah

  383. Florian

    I agree, interop would be great

  384. Florian

    but we should get the environments set up beforehand

  385. stpeter

    BOSH is so tired, it's all about websockets these days :P

  386. dwd

    stpeter, Oh, I'd like to get the XMPP crowd together with the Federated SOcial Biscuit crowd.

  387. dwd

    stpeter, Yes, but don't count your eggs before your chickens, or possibly the other way around, as the saying might go.

  388. Florian

    so why not make the Friday: Interop / Hack only

  389. Florian

    i.e. no discussions, just small focus groups

  390. Florian

    on specific topics

  391. Florian

    tbd before the event

  392. ralphm


  393. stpeter

    Florian: that's what we've proposed in the past, but it never worked out all that well because we didn't prepare ahead of time for real interop testing or hacking

  394. Florian

    right, it would work however, if we do Interop Week the whole week

  395. Florian

    and basically end it with IRL Interop on the Friday

  396. dwd

    stpeter, We have had some experience in defining interop environments, now - we ought to be able to get our shit together (as the kids say) ahead of time.

  397. stpeter

    ok, we've been chatting here for an hour -- it sounds like we need to establish some action items and meet again in a week or two?

  398. ralphm


  399. stpeter

    I can follow up on the Cisco space

  400. ralphm

    I'd like to receive suggestions for topics to put in the call

  401. dwd

    stpeter, Well, we need to coordinate "demo" things. That's an action item - maybe we setup a Wiki page and announce it via blog and mailing lists?

  402. stpeter

    dwd: sure

  403. bear frees from work and peeks in

  404. stpeter

    and also a list of hacking / interop items?

  405. dwd

    stpeter, Yes, that too. We'll need to arrange for a test network at The Venue, I imagine, if there is interest in interop.

  406. stpeter

    dwd: what would the test network entail?

  407. ralphm

    Yes, it is a bring-your-own-gear-but-not-wireless kinda event

  408. stpeter

    there is always a guest network at Cisco locations -- would we need something more robust?

  409. bear

    do we need a wiki page for dev room speakers and demos again?

  410. ralphm

    (FOSDEM, at least, if we want to have functioning demos, a local network would be useful)

  411. dwd

    stpeter, A switch and some network cable would do.

  412. bear

    for the last interop we needed a switch to isolate the dns and certificate servers

  413. dwd

    ralphm, Good point.

  414. ralphm

    bear: I think so, yes

  415. ralphm

    My plan was to have a list of possible topics, to be included in the Call for Participation in the Devroom.

  416. ralphm

    and then sent out that call later this week

  417. bear

    I don't mind wrangling the talk list again (the messy part of wiki updates and stuff)

  418. ralphm

    We can do something similar for our own Summit days

  419. ralphm

    bear: awesome

  420. stpeter


  421. ralphm

    bear: we should be able to have quite some slots

  422. ralphm

    i.e. if would use the same slot size, we could have 16 slots

  423. bear


  424. ralphm

    so if anyone have suggestions for topics, send me an IM

  425. ralphm

    I'll draft the Call

  426. bear

    will the interop be a different event? (or has interop even been thought of yet as an event)

  427. ralphm

    I'm not sure if we are have a definite plan on that yet

  428. bear


  429. bear

    i'm loving the xmpp realtime room idea - I know the &yet dev team will be at fosdem, we should contact them for coding some sort of demo

  430. ralphm


  431. Florian

    bear: awesome idea!

  432. dwd

    bear, Could do, yes.

  433. ralphm

    I hope I can bring in my real-time backchannel stuff

  434. ralphm

    to aggregate stuff into

  435. dwd

    Florian, Also, book that Chinese. Before the Debian guys do.

  436. bear

    I don't mind at all using my flosoft servers for any of this

  437. ralphm


  438. Florian


  439. dwd

    That's *our* restaurant. They find their own.

  440. ralphm

    Who would like to summarize this meeting?

  441. Florian

    I'm sure we can ship a few servers for demos / interop :)

  442. bear


  443. MattJ

    I can summarize

  444. ralphm

    MattJ: Thanks!

  445. stpeter

    yes, thanks

  446. stpeter

    that reminds me, we need to get http://xmpp.org:5290/muc_log/muc.xmpp.org/xsf/ working again

  447. ralphm

    I'm going to contact Pascal about possibilities to do a lounge kinda thing

  448. stpeter

    ralphm: thanks

  449. MattJ

    stpeter, yep, on my todo (for this evening hopefully)

  450. dwd

    ralphm, I do think that slot where the beagle-board people were last year would be awesome.

  451. ralphm

    in any case we need to carefully plan logistics to pull that off

  452. ralphm

    you cannot send stuff to the ULB

  453. ralphm

    dwd: how much depth do you think we need?

  454. ralphm

    we don't want to block passages

  455. stpeter

    MattJ: I'm recovered from the IETF meeting so I'm going to start working on various iteam/bofh/etc. items

  456. stpeter

    MattJ: I have a zillion passwords to change at jabber.org for instance :)

  457. MattJ

    Heh, I believe it

  458. dwd

    ralphm, Well, we need a wider than normal area, I think - wider than the last couple of stands have been - but otherwise just removing the tables does most of the work.

  459. stpeter

    and it would be nice to get http://xmpp.org/resources/public-services/ functioning correctly again

  460. stpeter

    dwd: a standless stand? ;-)

  461. Florian

    stpeter: no, a Standing room only stand :D

  462. bear

    I want to help but also realize I should keep working on the testing code :/

  463. stpeter


  464. dwd

    stpeter, Yes, basically. Florian did suggest beanbags. I have a mad idea of a hammock, but I don't actually have any idea how that would work.

  465. stpeter

    bear: do we have any code? shall we start doing Agile development with scrums and such? ;-)

  466. Florian

    a hammock would be awesome ... but takes too much space for too fee people :/

  467. Florian

    but something like Bar stools

  468. bear

    poke mozilla for money hard - fosdem is big for us so we (xsf) should take advantage of them ;)

  469. dwd

    Florian, I did look at those bar-stool-height director chairs with quite some envy.

  470. bear

    I have been talking with sleekxmpp dev named lance about that - we have "plans" :)

  471. dwd

    bear, Lance is quite smart. And I would find it a giggle for the XMPP validator to be using my SASL stack. :-)

  472. dwd

    (Which, I should note, Lance made a heck of a lot prettier)

  473. bear

    i'm a firm believer in code reuse

  474. bear

    and I know i'm not smart enough to roll my own crypto stack

  475. dwd

    bear, Nor am I.

  476. bear


  477. MattJ

    No-one is

  478. stpeter

    hey, plus the euro keeps falling, so this could be an inexpensive trip for those of us travelling from North America...

  479. bear


  480. dwd

    We all stand in a circle and use the person on the left's crypto stack.

  481. bear

    i'm pushing hard for work and wife so I can attend

  482. dwd

    stpeter, Cheap to get here, impossible to return.

  483. dwd

    bear, Don't you have both already?

  484. dwd

    bear, Oh, I see.

  485. Florian


  486. MattJ

    stpeter, :D

  487. dwd

    Florian, You misspelt - http://thesaurus.com/browse/loll

  488. Tobias

    stpeter, yeah..really great for those having huge stacks of gsoc money laying around in europe ;)

  489. stpeter

    ok are we done?

  490. bear

    oops - that was an interesting english phrasing gaff

  491. stpeter is supposed to be on vacation this week :)

  492. ralphm bangs the gavel

  493. Tobias has left

  494. MattJ

    Thanks :)

  495. stpeter

    MattJ: thanks for writing up the minutes

  496. MattJ


  497. ralphm

    dwd: in Dutch, 'lol' means fun

  498. dwd

    ralphm, Ah, op zohn fiets...

  499. dwd murders Dutch.

  500. ralphm

    dwd: wow, you're learning. Good. Quite an idiom, too.

  501. ralphm

    except for the 'h' needing to be an apostrophe

  502. dwd

    ralphm, It's about the only bit of Dutch that I know, mind. Still, not too bad from memory.

  503. Tobias has joined

  504. ralphm


  505. bear

    peter, i'm going to email a mozilla person about fosdem and cc you

  506. stpeter

    bear: cool

  507. bear

    I would love for them to coordinate any part of this with us - so maybe they can help pay for some of it :)

  508. stpeter

    right :)

  509. bear

    what is your preferred email for htis stuff?

  510. ralphm

    bear: could you cc me on fosdem stuff?

  511. stpeter

    bear: I think last year we might have made money on FOSDEM :) meeting at the (free) Cisco building helped with that

  512. stpeter

    bear: stpeter -at- stpeter.im

  513. bear

    what email to use for you ralphm?

  514. ralphm

    my jid

  515. bear


  516. ralphm

    ralphm@ik.nu, yes

  517. MattJ

    ...and I think I may have an idea for an XMPP project + talk, I'll think a little before I submit it though :)

  518. ralphm


  519. bear

    i'm sending the email to david ascher because he is part of the identity/realtime web project team

  520. bear

    and I also think he's known to xmpp folk already

  521. luca tagliaferri has joined

  522. ralphm

    bear: good text. Thanks!

  523. luca tagliaferri has left

  524. Kev returns.

  525. Kev

    Just in time to avoid any sort of actions, it seems.

  526. MattJ

    No you're not

  527. MattJ

    I was scrolled up re-reading the log, but I just scrolled down to ask...

  528. MattJ

    Who wants to be assigned the action to create a wiki page for the list of demo applications?

  529. MattJ

    If no-one, then I'll assign it to myself

  530. ralphm

    MattJ: deal

  531. MattJ


  532. MattJ


  533. stpeter

    can't that go on the FOSDEM_2012 page on the wiki?

  534. MattJ

    I think

  535. MattJ


  536. MattJ

    Then someone should send an announcement about it to the lists, to make sure we cast as wide a net as possible

  537. ralphm

    I have volunteered for that

  538. MattJ


  539. stpeter

    all right, I'm going to disappear from IM for a few days, but I'll likely be on email while I catch up on the inbox backlog and such

  540. ralphm

    very good

  541. ralphm

    enjoy your time off

  542. stpeter


  543. stpeter has left

  544. bear


  545. Ashley Roach has left

  546. Steffen Larsen has left

  547. simon has joined

  548. Florian has left

  549. simon

    Just saw Ralph's invitation. Anything I can help with?

  550. ralphm

    simon: heh, I invited you as somebody mentioned Buddycloud

  551. simon

    my ears are burning.

  552. ralphm

    there are plans to do a real-time demo thing at FOSDEM

  553. simon

    I'm all up for realtime demos. Dancing ponies and good wifi not withstanding.

  554. ralphm

    simon: there will be 3G sims again

  555. simon

    but by fosdem I'm hoping you will all have fired up your own v1.0 buddycloud server ;)

  556. Much Better Ashley has left

  557. bear

    seems that mozilla is planning for fosdem also - things more than just cool demos

  558. bear

    trying to dig out some details

  559. bear ponders how an open source company can be so opaque sometimes to members of it's own staff

  560. MattJ


  561. simon

    bear - I had a good chat with David from the messaging team about webFWD. It looks like we might "embed" with the Mozilla team for a bit.

  562. bear

    oh - did not know that (not that I should have or something)

  563. Florob has joined

  564. bear

    he seems worried that, if mozilla offers xmpp client support, that mozilla will also have to offer a server side to make the initial/new mozilla user experience not painful

  565. bear

    like what happens with sync

  566. ralphm

    except lots of people already have XMPP accounts

  567. simon

    you mean build their own server?

  568. bear


  569. bear

    so that a new install has someplace to go to by default

  570. simon

    does Mozilla produce a webserver?

  571. bear

    they learned that with thunderbird - sooo many folks expected to have an email address when they installed thunderbird

  572. bear

    yes for the start page

  573. bear

    every user when it starts goes to mozilla.org

  574. bear

    err .com

  575. simon

    presumably pushing registrations to a list of open servers that want to host users is an option. That's what we're trying to do with buddycloud. Browse content, register -> choose domain to register on. sign-in and start posting.

  576. ralphm

    bear: really?

  577. ralphm

    bear: I've never considered wanting a mozilla e-mail address

  578. bear

    it's what i'm talking to him about now - one of the big questions that came up

  579. bear

    when they surveyed folks who installed tbird but never used it - that was the biggest reason

  580. bear

    this was in the non-tech user space

  581. ralphm has left

  582. ralphm has joined

  583. Florob has left

  584. simon has left

  585. Tobias has left