XSF Discussion - 2013-01-04

  1. Neustradamus has joined

  2. skinkie has left

  3. Lance has joined

  4. Ashley has left

  5. Jef has left

  6. Ashley has joined

  7. Jef has joined

  8. Jef has left

  9. Ashley has left

  10. Ashley has joined

  11. Ashley has left

  12. Ashley has joined

  13. Ashley has left

  14. Lance has joined

  15. Jef has joined

  16. Ashley has joined

  17. Jef has left

  18. Jef has joined

  19. Jef has left

  20. Jef has joined

  21. Ashley has left

  22. Jef has left

  23. Ashley has joined

  24. intosi has joined

  25. Neustradamus has left

  26. Neustradamus has joined

  27. MiGri has joined

  28. Florian has left

  29. Ashley has left

  30. Lloyd has joined

  31. Ashley has joined

  32. Florian has joined

  33. Ashley has left

  34. Florian has left

  35. Florian has joined

  36. Florian has left

  37. Florian has joined

  38. Florian has left

  39. Florian has joined

  40. Florian has left

  41. Florian has joined

  42. Florian has left

  43. Florian has joined

  44. Florian has left

  45. Florian has joined

  46. Ashley has joined

  47. Ashley has left

  48. Florian has left

  49. Ashley has joined

  50. Lance has joined

  51. Ashley has left

  52. Lance has joined

  53. Ashley has joined

  54. intosi has left

  55. Lance has joined

  56. Neustradamus has joined

  57. Ashley has joined

  58. Lance has joined

  59. Lance has joined

  60. Neustradamus has joined

  61. Ashley has joined

  62. Ashley has left

  63. Ashley has joined

  64. Alex has joined

  65. stpeter has joined

  66. Nÿco has joined

  67. Lance has joined

  68. Lance has joined

  69. Lance has joined

  70. Alex has left

  71. Lloyd has left

  72. arcriley

    I see in my firebug window some very interesting websocket output

  73. arcriley

    <stream:stream xmlns='jabber:client' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' id='9b439c94-c8b7-4344-9b30-58dd3c46b6b2' from='localhost' version='1.0' xml:lang='en'>

  74. arcriley

    <stream:features><mechanisms xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl'><mechanism>SCRAM-SHA-1</mechanism><mechanism>DIGEST-MD5</mechanism></mechanisms></stream:features>

  75. arcriley

    so mod_xmpp is now cutting the server stream into stanzas *and* removing <starttls/> from stream features

  76. arcriley

    i think its damned close to first release time!

  77. stpeter


  78. arcriley

    afaik this is the first full implementation of xmpp over websockets

  79. arcriley

    there's some rough edges in the last draft

  80. stpeter

    arcriley: there are, please provide feedback to the xmpp@ietf.org list

  81. stpeter

    arcriley: I thought that there was an implementation in ejabberd

  82. arcriley

    is there?

  83. stpeter

    the draft co-author worked on ejabberd at the time

  84. stpeter

    and I know one person at the XMPP Summit last year had an implementation

  85. arcriley

    ah cool

  86. arcriley

    how did they hook into the webserver?

  87. stpeter

    not sure

  88. stpeter

    I didn't hear about the details

  89. arcriley

    websockets support in webservers isnt exactly... yea

  90. stpeter


  91. arcriley

    thats why I wrote this, its the cleanest way to implement it without a bunch of hacks or http proxy stuff

  92. arcriley

    apache doesn't proxy websockets correctly either

  93. arcriley

    theres a module to implement websockets, but it seems to have an unstable api and you need to add an extra module on top of it to implement the protocol

  94. Jef has joined

  95. Jef has left

  96. Ashley has left

  97. Ashley has joined

  98. Alex has joined

  99. bear

    arcriley we are using haproxy to proxy websockets - v1.5 is handling it very nicely for us

  100. Lance

    so at the last summit, there was discussion on integrating MAM with result sets

  101. Lance

    particularly on requesting pages in reversed order

  102. Lance

    so I've written up a potential addition to XEP-0059 to make that work: https://gist.github.com/4458101

  103. stpeter

    Lance: excellent -- let's ping Matthew about that while we're at it (but you probably already have done so)

  104. Lance

    not yet, I don't think he's online

  105. stpeter

    haven't seen him

  106. stpeter

    but he is a man of many JIDs :)

  107. Lance

    indeed :)

  108. intosi has joined

  109. stpeter has left

  110. Nÿco has left

  111. intosi has left

  112. Alex has left